BREAKING-EXCLUSIVE: Scientology’s Top Corporation Made Uranium Mines Swap with U.S. Government

Sunday, 14 January 2018 by

This is startling new information arising exclusively from research for the book Stargate: The Hoax, by Ashton Gray, the upcoming sequel to his landmark CIA exposé Watergate: The Hoax, currently on sale at AmazoniBooks, Barnes & Noble, and other fine book retailers.

In a Chalet Reports exclusive, we have discovered that Scientology’s most powerful organization, the so-called “Church of Spiritual Technology” (which is not a church), spent six years and millions of dollars digging an underground “vault” on a property where there are now uranium mines, then “traded” that property to the U.S. government for a property of much less value.

Yesterday, 13 January 2018, one of our researchers uncovered astonishing new information about Scientology’s top-level corporation, the so-called “Church of Spiritual Technology” (CST)—which a federal judge, Bruggink, has ruled is not a church—and a land “trade” it made on 24 August 1992 with the U.S. federal government.

We have long known of the property in New Mexico known colloquially as “the Trementina Base,” information that was posted in the extraordinary  Remote Viewing Timeline, and even made it to Wikipedia through the poster known as Huntley Troth—to whom we all owe a great deal in the research for Watergate: The Hoax.

We also knew of the strange trade that happened in 1992, under the outgoing George H. W. Bush administration—when CST, after investing millions of dollars over at least six years in digging a secret underground “vault” on its original property (see T. 17 N., R. 23 E. on map above), made a “trade” to the U.S. government for a property of much less value (see T. 15 N., R. 22 E. on map above). CST lost a still-unknown amount on this “trade,” but it definitely lost its precious “vault,” which CST had claimed was absolutely vital to the “religion” because supposedly it was built to hold all of L. Ron Hubbard’s original works.

Now in an explosive (pun unavoidable) exclusive FIRST, through some clever initiative and mapping overlays by one of our researchers, Chalet Books has discovered that the property CST traded to the U.S. government—after digging underground for six years—currently has eight uranium mines, according to US-Mining.com’s map of the Trementino, New Mexico area. Obviously, it is not evident on that map that some of those mines are all or partially on the former CST property, but our researcher used a variety of maps to overlay, producing the map at the top of this post.

George H. W. Bush was the President throughout the entire time period of CST digging underground, then trading the property to the government. Bush senior had also been very instrumental in the CIA’s operation to assassinate L. Ron Hubbard (as covered in Watergate: The Hoax) and steal his intellectual property for the CIA’s secret remote viewing program, which was going on throughout. Bill Clinton had to have been briefed on all of it.

Then, only a year after this “trade,” the U.S. federal government granted tax exemption to all Scientology organizations—including CST. In the formerly secret IRS “Closing Agreement,” it is exposed that granting of tax exemption gave CST complete rights and control over all of L. Ron Hubbard’s copyrights and trademarks. All of that is thoroughly documented at this massive chronological collection of documents. See also:

Over 10,000 Copyrights Owned by the Church of Spiritual Technology (CST)

Trademarks controlled by CST and IRS

There inevitably will be more to come on this, especially as Uranium One scandal unfolds, but this information was so startling that we felt we had to make it known immediately.

This demands a Congressional investigation, and Chalet Books demands that Congress act NOW!

 

 

Watergate: The Hoax is available now
at Amazon, iBooks and 
Barnes & Noble.
Order it today!

Rewrite history with the truth!

 

 

read more

CIA: The Largest Criminal Organization in the History of the World

Saturday, 13 January 2018 by

This is an excerpt from the book  Watergate: The Hoax, by Ashton Gray, now on sale at AmazoniBooks, Barnes & Noble, and other fine book retailers. This is the Afterword, offered here in full as a public service because the same types of crimes by the CIA are being used in the world today:

[John F.] Kennedy was . . . once quoted in a New York Times report,
by an anonymous source said to be a trusted aide, as saying he wanted “to splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds.”
Evan Burgos, NBC News

When the fires of ideology threaten to consume us all, it is time to forget politics and seek reason.
L. Ron Hubbard

The Central Intelligence Agency is the largest criminal organization in the history of the world, along with all of its counterparts in other countries. They are almost entirely unregulated, because they can hide any crime, any atrocity, any abuse, any plot behind the impenetrable veil of “national security.”

There will never be any way to account fully for the number of lives ruined or destroyed by Watergate, by the nullification of L. Ron Hubbard, and by the perversion of his organizations and works then carried out by mercenary agents of the US government and the Five Eyes. There will never be any way to account fully for the costs to the American people and to the world.

Whether John F. Kennedy actually said he wanted to “splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds” or not is disputed, but if he did, it’s little wonder that soon afterwards he was brutally and hideously gunned down in broad daylight. If we are ever to regain our rights and freedoms as a nation, and our sovereignty as free citizens of a free nation, that criminal organization must be brought to book and shut down. It creates a thousand fold the threats that it “protects” us from. It has an unbroken track record of excess, crime, and rampant lying. It is made up entirely of professional liars. They lie for a living. They lie because they can. They do not start lying because they join an organization that permits it; the organization seeks people so morally and ethically bankrupt that they will lie for a living.

The researchers and editors and the author of this work are unanimous in calling on the American government, and on every government in the world, to demand a complete and unrelenting investigation into what Watergate actually was about, and to expose it entirely. The theft of Scientology by the CIA was an unspeakable crime—no matter what was done to L. Ron Hubbard—because it was a crime against man’s right to knowledge.

The evidence is overwhelming that once Hubbard was eliminated and the technology stolen, the CIA and the Five Eyes launched a vicious decades-long campaign to smear and discredit everything about Hubbard and his works, for no other reason than to gain a sick militaristic monopoly over a benign philosophy that ever only sought to set men free and help them realize their full potentials. There also is an overwhelming amount of evidence that infiltrators inside the so-called Church of Scientology, working on behalf of the same criminals that stole Hubbards works, have now buried all the originals of those works, literally, underground. For the full story, see the sequel to this book, Stargate: The Hoax.

Please don’t stop here. Please take action. Please demand honesty and integrity as the first requirement for those who would claim a right to “protect” us. Please demand that criminals not be given unlimited black budgets to run a “protection” racket on us that includes blackmail, murder, warmongering, perversion, torture, drugs, assassinations, and treachery as “noble” pursuits of national security. That is just another lie. That is the work of criminals, not protectors of decency and security.

As for Scientology, this book takes no stand on it, pro or con. The research for this work has proven conclusively, though, that the vast majority of “public opinion” about the philosophy has been maliciously manufactured by the CIA and the Five Eyes, using smear authors such as Jon Atack and Russell Miller to spread unspeakable lies and distortions for no other purpose than to generate hatred.

For instance, the vilified Rehabilitation Project Force was not created by L. Ron Hubbard; it was created by the infiltrators Ken Urquhart and Andre Tabayoyon, and was based exclusively on CIA-created “technology” for driving human beings into a state of degradation, which Tabayoyon had been trained in. It isn’t Scientology; it is reverse Scientology, or, as Hubbard called it, “Black Dianetics.” It is vicious, and it was created solely to engender revulsion in the public against Scientology.

This work is no advocate for Scientology, but it is a loud and vocal advocate for your right to any knowledge that you choose to seek, without it being twisted, altered, perverted, lied about, or buried where you cannot access it. Anyone who twists, alters, perverts, lies about, or buries knowledge, no matter what the source of that knowledge, commits treason against mankind.

Knowledge is our only hope. Preserve it. Share it. Honor it. Forbid its destruction or condemnation. Forbid control and government by elite totalitarians who live on lies.

The following quotation of free verse poetry by L. Ron Hubbard happens to be about the philosophy that he spent his life developing, but it could be as well applicable to any knowledge that mankind has been able to gain toward greater freedom and ability:

I will not always be here on guard.
The stars twinkle in the Milky Way
And the wind sighs for songs
Across the empty fields of a planet
A galaxy away.

You won’t always be here.
But before you go,
Whisper this to your sons
And their sons:

“The work was free. Keep it so.”

L. Ron Hubbard

With great respect and sincere thanks to you for taking the time to read this work, I wish you happiness, love, honesty, integrity, and a bright future.

Ashton Gray

 

 

Watergate: The Hoax is available now
at Amazon, iBooks and 
Barnes & Noble.
Order it today!

Rewrite history with the truth!

 

 

read more

Excerpt: Chapter 10, “World War III: The Battle for Men’s Minds”

Friday, 5 January 2018 by

This is an excerpt from the book Watergate: The Hoax, by Ashton Gray, now on sale at AmazoniBooks, Barnes & Noble, and other fine book retailers. This is Chapter 10, “World War III: The Battle for Men’s Minds”


We need a program of psychosurgery and political control of our society.
The purpose is physical control of the mind. Everyone who deviates from the given norm can be surgically mutilated. The individual may think that the most important reality is his own existence, but this is only his personal point of view. This lacks historical perspective. Man does not have the right to develop his own mind. This kind of liberal orientation has great appeal. We must electrically control the brain. Some day armies and generals will be controlled by electrical stimulation of the brain.

Dr. Jose Delgado, CIA MK-ULTRA Psychiatrist

You’ve already seen the second slavery stage start. . . .
It became terribly important to them to shut all the boundaries on knowledge. And you’ve seen those things, those curtains shutting down.
And those were the shades of night falling. . . . The whole nonsense of thought police is moving right straight in. The shades of night. Now we’ve got a period here of a very short space of time.
L. Ron Hubbard, public lecture of 8 December 1952

On Thursday, 20 April 1950, the CIA’s Project BLUEBIRD was authorized by Director of the CIA Roscoe Hillenkoetter. It was the official, if hidden, declaration of a war on mankind, its ultimate goal being the eradication of individual freedom through enslavement of men’s minds and nullification of their souls.

If that sounds melodramatic, it probably is understatement, not overstatement. Under the protection and funding of the secret project, psychiatrists and doctors contracted to the CIA began an assault on freedom of thought and human dignity using horror-movie experiments that included lobotomies, icepick leucotomies, electroconvulsive shock, insulin comas, electrode implants in the brains of conscious subjects, sexual abuse, hypnosis, pain, and drugs. American and foreign citizens were used as unwitting subjects in the experiments. These human guinea pigs included US military personnel, mental patients, prison inmates, people lured in off the street, and even children.

It was the launch of World War III, a war without borders, a war on minds and souls, and it continues to this moment. Watergate—the hoax—was a strategic assault in that war.

On Tuesday, 9 May 1950—just 19 days after the secret official sanctioning of the CIA’s Project BLUEBIRD—L. Ron Hubbard’s book Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health (DMSMH) first hit the book stores and news stands. With almost uncanny insight into what the CIA secretly was doing, Hubbard said in his book that Dianetics was an approach to the mind “without drugs, hypnotism, surgery, shock, or other artificial means,” and that its goal was “creation of mental freedom,” a goal in direct opposition to the super-control over human beings that was being sought by the CIA and its minions. That marked Hubbard as an enemy of the CIA who had to be captured and controlled, or eliminated.

About two weeks after DMSMH was published, on or about Thursday, 25 May 1950, a high-ranking officer from the Office of Naval Research (ONR) visited L. Ron Hubbard in Washington, DC. The Office of Naval Research was a primary contractor in the CIA’s obsession with mind control techniques, and the officer was demanding that Hubbard work for them:

So this fellow, this officer from the Office of Naval Research, came to see me right here in Washington and he wanted me to go on as a civilian employee in order to use what I knew of the mind to make men more suggestible.

And I smiled a feline smile. And I said, “No.”

And he smiled like something out of Faust, and he said to me, “Well, all you have to do is say ‘no,’ and I will call you back to active duty because you still are an officer of the United States Navy.”

And with that purr he exited.

What the ONR officer didn’t know was that several years earlier, on 14 November 1947, Hubbard had submitted a letter resigning from the US Naval Reserve. Although he had received permission to resign, he had withdrawn the resignation request on 19 February 1948, in response to a letter from the Chief of Naval Personnel asking him to reconsider. When the ONR officer who was demanding that Hubbard work for them left, Hubbard dug up his letter of permission to resign. On Saturday, 27 May 1950, he convinced an admiral at the Potomac River Naval Command to accept the resignation and get it officially approved:

4303 Elm St.
Bethesda, Md.
May 27, 1950

FROM: Lieut. LaFayette R. Hubbard, (D) USNR, 113392 (inactive).
TO: The Secretary of Navy.
VIA: The Chief of Naval Personnel.

Subj: Resignation – submission of.

1. I desire to resign my commission as lieutenant senior grade in the United States Naval Reserve as of this date.

2. Since the latter part of my active service in the war was served in a hospital, under treatment for nine months, and since I have been before survey boards and the retiring board, I do not believe I could further serve in event of further emergency. Retirement was not granted but I am still considered to be 50% disabled by the Veteran’s Administration.

3. As a writer, I sometimes must write on technical subjects and while these have no bearing on naval matters or government security of any kind I would feel much freer were I not a commissioned officer in the naval reserve.

4. In 1948 I tendered a resignation which was answered with a request from the secretary that I consider the matter again. I have duly considered this action and discover that I still find it expedient to resign.

5. As I would not be of use in the event of war, as I have taken no part in post war naval activities, it is certain that my continued commissioned status is of no benefit to the navy. It is therefore respectfully requested and urged that this resignation be accepted.

[Signature]
LaFayette R. Hubbard
__________________________________________

Via: Bethesda, Maryland
Commandant, POTOMAC RIVER NAVAL COMMAND

Subj: Acceptance of Resignation from the US Naval Reserve
Ref: (a) Your resignation dated 27 May 1950
Encl. (1) Honorable discharge

1. In accordance with your request contained in reference (a), and by direction of the President, your resignation from the US Naval Reserve is hereby accepted under honorable conditions, effective this date.

2. The Navy Department at this time expresses its appreciation of your past services and trusts that you will continue your interest in the naval service.

3. Please acknowledge receipt to the Chief of Naval Personnel (attention Pers-B1136) via the Commandant, Potomac River Naval Command.

FRANCIS S. MATTHEWS
Secretary of the Navy

Hubbard happily had the approval of resignation waiting when the ONR officer returned:

When the high brass came back to see me again, he says, “Well, have you decided?”

“Yes,” I said, “I’ve decided not to go in.”

He said, “Well,” he said, “I guess I have no other choice but to draft you in at your old rank.”

And I said, “I’m very sorry”—omitting the “Sir,”—“I’m very sorry, but I’m no longer a member of the Armed Services.”

He said, “What’s this?”

I said, “Yes, as a matter of fact here it is. Here’s the Secretary of the Navy’s okay. He accepted my—”

And that was an end of a beautiful friendship with the American government.

Less than three weeks later, DMSMH hit The New York Times Best Sellers list, on Sunday, 18 June 1950, and stayed there for over six months. To say that the episode with ONR was “an end of a beautiful friendship with the American government” was definitely understatement; it was the beginning of an all-out war by the US government— and its Commonwealth allies—on Hubbard, Dianetics, and, subsequently, Scientology.

The wildfire popularity of Dianetics catapulted Hubbard into the limelight. He began touring with a dizzying schedule of public lectures, sometimes lecturing daily. He set up the Hubbard Dianetic Research Foundation and taught a full-time Dianetics course, “The Professional Course,” part of which included more personal lectures. By July 1950, even haughty Time magazine—a CIA mouthpiece under the CIA’s Operation Mockingbird—had to weigh in on the phenomenon:

Bookstores in Los Angeles were selling “Dianetics” on an under-the-counter basis. Armed with the manual, which they called simply “The Book,” fanatical converts overflowed Saturday night meetings in Hollywood, held Dianetics parties, formed clubs, and “audited” (treated) each other.

By the end of 1950, over 750 Dianetics groups had been formed in the US. It became an occasion for much wailing and gnashing of psychiatric teeth, with psychologists and psychiatrists practically lining up to write or speak scathing, bitter denunciations of Hubbard and Dianetics in any media that would host them. Many of those publications and media outlets were CIA mouthpieces under Operation Mockingbird, which included all major US newspapers, news syndicates, magazines, and radio and TV networks. Colin A. Ross summarized the CIA mind-control bedfellows in his landmark book, The CIA Doctors—Human Rights Violations by American Psychiatrists:

The participation of psychiatrists and medical schools in mind control research was not a matter of a few scattered doctors pursuing questionable lines of investigation. . . . Rather, the mind control experimentation was systematic, organized, and involved many leading psychiatrists and medical schools. . . . Mind control contractors with TOP SECRET clearance included the American Psychological Association, past presidents of the American Psychiatric Association and the Society for Biological Psychiatry, and psychiatrists who have received awards from the American Psychological Association and the American Psychiatric Association.

Psychologists and psychiatrists—hereinafter the psycho-establishment—had enjoyed an iron-grip monopoly on the mind of man for decades, and had built a multibillion dollar industry in league with the pharmaceutical giants, pushing drugs such as chlorpromazine, scopolamine, opiates, mescaline, cocaine, amphetamines, barbiturates, and LSD into throats and veins at an alarming rate, while also getting government subsidies for “treatments” that Torquemada would have longed for, such as electroconvulsive shock and lobotomies. The real money for the psycho-establishment, though, was just starting to flood into its bank accounts, sucked out of the pockets of hapless taxpayers through the CIA’s uncontrolled, unaccounted-for black budget pipelines.

But now Hubbard had come along and put mental therapy into the hands of housewives, busboys, bus drivers, engineers, executives, shoe salesmen, construction workers—in short, anyone who could read DMSMH and follow the relatively simple processes and techniques—and the entire subject of Dianetics was aimed at freeing the mind, not controlling, suppressing, or enslaving it. Dianetics was a dire threat to the entire psycho-establishment, its Big-Pharma twisted sisters, and the CIA.

If that weren’t bad enough, Hubbard raised the stakes exponentially in August 1951 when he published his follow-up to DMSMH, a book called Science of Survival. In it, Hubbard sent a shot directly across the CIA’s bow—and, ironically, across the Soviet KGB’s bow, too (emphasis added):

There is another form of hypnotism which falls between the surgical operation and straight hypnotism without physical pain. This form of hypnotism has been a carefully guarded secret of certain military and intelligence organizations. It is a vicious war weapon and may be of considerably more use in conquering a society than the atom bomb. This is no exaggeration. The extensiveness of the use of this form of hypnotism in espionage work is so wide today that it is long past the time when people should have become alarmed about it. It required dianetic processing to uncover pain-drug-hypnosis. Otherwise, pain-drug-hypnosis was out of sight, unsuspected, and unknown.

Pain-drug-hypnosis is a wicked extension of narco-synthesis, the drug hypnosis used in America only during and since the last war.

The implications were grim for the intelligence agencies and their mad scientists of mind control: Dianetic processes had exposed the very techniques that the CIA, the KGB, and the psycho-establishment on both “sides” were using in their tireless, costly, and very secret efforts to create a “Manchurian Candidate”—a sort of automaton who would carry out post-hypnotic commands laid in with pain, drugs, and hypnosis (PDH). Dianetics could penetrate the “veil” of amnesia that the CIA and its psycho-establishment sycophants had labored so long to be able to produce in its subjects, and Dianetics even could reveal the very methods that had been used to create the amnesia.

The same month as the wide-scale publication of Science of Survival, on 20 August 1951, the CIA changed the name of its mind control project from BLUEBIRD to ARTICHOKE. Nobody ever has established anything resembling a rational explanation for why the name was changed, but then, it’s the CIA, and “rational” is probably too high a standard to expect. The name change did serve, though, as a rhetorical shell game to introduce confusion—and confusion is the CIA’s No. 1 product.

Aside from the obvious, one prime reason for the CIA to create its own dark curtain of secrecy to hide behind was that some of the biggest banking and industrial interests in the world were active participants in trying to gain control over the minds of men. H.P. Albarelli, Jr., in his seminal work, A Terrible Mistake—The Murder of Frank Olson and the CIA’s Secret Cold War Experiments, revealed how the Rockefellers were fueling more than vehicles with their Standard Oil fortunes; they were helping to fuel the psycho- establishment:

The US Department of Health, Education and Welfare (HEW) undertook drug experiments sponsored by the CIA when [Nelson] Rockefeller was department undersecretary in 1953. Many of these experiments involved CIA funding and required Rockefeller’s specific approval. Also, beginning in the early 1950s, the Rockefeller Foundation had been funding CIA front groups like the Fund for Human Ecology, which was directly involved in CIA- supported behavior “modification” experiments. Beginning even earlier, in 1943, the Foundation had been funding a psychiatric research facility, the Allan Memorial Institute in Montreal, Canada, which soon became the site of some of the CIA’s most notorious and horrific psychological experiments, conducted by Rockefeller-funded Dr. Ewen Cameron.

That’s part of the reason why Nelson Rockefeller would become one of the prime actors in the CIA’s takedown of Hubbard, the theft of Hubbard’s OT Levels, and the subsequent cover-up.

Hubbard had been correct in saying that pain-drug-hypnosis “may be of considerably more use in conquering a society than the atom bomb,” as some of the available declassified documents on CIA mind control experiments with hypnosis demonstrate:

Hypnotic Experimentation and Research, 10 February 1954
Miss [Doe]171 was then instructed (having previously expressed a fear of firearms in any fashion) that she would use every method at her disposal to awaken Miss [Jones] (now in a deep hypnotic sleep) and failing in this, she would pick up a pistol nearby and fire it at Miss [Jones]. She was instructed that her rage would be so great that she would not hesitate to “kill” Miss [Jones] for failing to awaken. Miss [Doe] carried out these suggestions to the letter including firing the (unloaded pneumatic pistol) gun at Miss [Jones] and then proceeding to fall into a deep sleep. After proper suggestions were made, both were awakened and expressed complete amnesia for the entire sequence. Miss [Doe] was again handed the gun, which she refused (in an awakened state) to pick up or accept from the operator. She expressed absolute denial that the foregoing sequence had happened.

Two other subjects also carried out their post-hypnotic suggestions “to the letter” and had no memory of the experiment:

SI [Special Interrogations] and H [Hypnosis] Experimentation (25 September 1951)
[Miss White] was instructed that upon awakening, she would proceed to [Mr. Black’s] room where she would wait at the desk for a telephone call. Upon receiving the call, a person known as “Jim” would engage her in normal conversation. During the course of the conversation, this individual would mention a code word to [Miss White]. When she heard this code word she would pass into a SI trance state, but would not close her eyes and remain perfectly normal and continue the telephone conversation. She was told that thereafter upon conclusion of the telephone conversation, she would then carry out the following instructions:

[Miss White], being in a complete SI state at this time, was then told to open her eyes and was shown an electric timing device. She was informed that this timing device was an incendiary bomb and was then instructed how to attach and set the device. After [Miss White] had indicated that she had learned how to set and attach the device, she was told to return to a sleep state and further instructed that upon concluding of the aforementioned conversation, she would take the timing device which was in a briefcase and proceed to the ladies room.

In the ladies room, she would be met by a girl whom she had never seen who would identify herself by the code word “New York.” After identifying herself, [Miss White] was then to show this individual how to attach and set the timing device, and further instructions would be given the individual by [Miss White] that the timing device was to be carried in the briefcase to [Mr. Black’s] room, placed in the nearest empty electric-light plug, and concealed in the bottom, left-hand drawer of [Mr. Black’s] desk, with the device set for 82 seconds and turned on. [Miss White] was further instructed to tell this other girl that as soon as the device had been set and turned on, she was to take the briefcase, leave [Mr. Black’s] room, go to the operations room, and go to the sofa and enter a deep sleep state. [Miss White] was further instructed that after completion of instructing the other girl and the transferring to the other girl of the incendiary bomb, she was to return at once to the operations room, sit on the sofa, and go into a deep sleep state.

Hypnosis was so effective at getting young ladies to do things against their will that at least one such “expert” bragged to the CIA’s head of ARTICHOKE, Morse Allen, of some of his other uses of the technique:

On 2 July 1951 approximately 1:00 p.m. the instruction began with [CIA Svengali] relating to the student some of his sexual experiences. [CIA Svengali] stated that he had constantly used hypnotism as a means of inducing young girls to engage in sexual intercourse with him. [Mrs. Clarinet], a performer in [Metropolis] orchestra, was forced to engage in sexual intercourse with [CIA Svengali] while under the influence of hypnotism. [CIA Svengali] stated that he first put her into a hypnotic trance and then suggested to her that he was her husband and that she desired sexual intercourse with him.

The arrogant indifference that the CIA and the psycho-establishment had to the inhumanity of their methods is difficult for most people to face, much less grasp, but is illuminated by more of the documents uncovered through the Freedom of Information Act, these dispassionately discussing the use of electroconvulsive shock:

Quite often amnesia occurs for events just prior to the convulsion, during the convulsion and during the post seizure state. It is possible that hypnosis or hypnotic activity induced during the post-seizure state might be lost in amnesia. This would be very valuable.

_______________________

Metrozal, which has been very useful in shock therapy, is no longer popular because, for one thing it produces feelings of overwhelming terror and doom prior to the convulsion.

But terror, anxiety, worry would be valuable for many purposes from our point of view.

_______________________

3 December 1951

[Professor Shockdoctor] is reported to be an authority on electric shock. He is a professor at the Medical School of the [Sellout University] and, in addition, is a psychiatrist of considerable note. Pro[fessor Shockdoctor] is, in addition, a fully cleared Agency consultant.

[Professor Shockdoctor] explained that he felt that electric shock might be of considerable interest to the “ARTICHOKE” type of work. He stated that the standard electric- shock machine (Reiter) could be used in two ways. One setting of this machine produced the normal electric-shock treatment (including convulsion) with amnesia after a number of treatments. He stated that using this machine as an electro-shock device with the convulsive treatment, he felt that he could guarantee amnesia for certain periods of time and particularly he could guarantee amnesia for any knowledge of use of the convulsive shock.

[Professor Shockdoctor] stated that the other or lower setting of the machine produced a different type of shock. He said that he could not explain it, but knew that when this lower current type of shock was applied without convulsion, it had the effect of making a man talk. He said, however, that the use of this type of shock was prohibited because it produced in the individual excruciating pain and he stated that there would be no question in his mind that the individual would be quite willing to give information if threatened with the use of this machine.

He stated that this was a third-degree method but, undoubtedly, would be effective. [Professor Shockdoctor] stated that he had never had the device applied to himself, but he had talked with people who had been shocked in this manner and stated that they complained that their whole head was on fire and it was much too painful a treatment for any medical practice. He stated that the only way it was ever used was in connection with sedatives and even then it was extremely painful. The writer asked [Professor Shockdoctor] whether or not in the “groggy” condition following the convulsion by the electro-shock machine anyone had attempted to obtain hypnotic control over the patient, since it occurred to the writer that it would be a good time to attempt to obtain hypnotic control. [Professor Shockdoctor] stated that, to his knowledge, it had never been done, but he could make this attempt in the near future at the [Sellout University] and he would see whether or not this could be done.

[Psychiatric Dr. Zappum] and [Psychiatric Dr. Lightsocket], as well as all others present, discussed the use of electro shock at considerable length and it was [Dr. Zappum’s] opinion that an individual could gradually be reduced through the use of electro-shock treatment to the vegetable level.

The CIA’s love affair with psychiatric shock and hypnosis was matched or exceeded by its love affair with LSD. One victim of CIA experiments with the drug, Mary Ray, testified in Congress about what she had witnessed with another victim:

SENATOR KENNEDY: How old were these test subjects?
MARY RAY: I remember one girl of 17, although I saw her written up as 18, and . . . she definitely did not want to be part of the experiment.
SENATOR KENNEDY: How did you know she did not?
MARY RAY: I saw her as they were taking her in, and she said she won’t go, and they said, “Yes, you will,” and she said, “Don’t take me back to that hell,” which makes me think she had a previous experiment.
SENATOR KENNEDY: What was she doing there? You were not forced or required to do this, were you?
MARY RAY: She was a patient and she was forced. They told her she had no choice. I remember this episode very well. There was an aide on her arm restraining her, and an orderly on another, and she kept saying she did not want to go in, and they said— I do not know which it was who said that, but they said, “You have to go; you have no choice.”
SENATOR KENNEDY: What did the doctor tell her?
MARY RAY: There was no doctor there. But I went back then about one or two hours later, and at this point she was totally disintegrated. She was absolutely psychotic. Before this she was a very normal appearing person; she would joke and gossip. . . . She was attractive and talkative. But afterwards she was just a mess. She was taken back to the ward, and she was for like four days mute, and you could not get through to her in any way. I tried to test her, and I went into her room and she was just staring straight ahead. I went like this [waving hands], and it was nothing; she did not seem to see me. I took her to the testing room where there were four others, and she walked right through a chair as though it was not there. Any position I put her body in, she would stay in.

Even as L. Ron Hubbard was ringing alarm bells about the dirty secrets of CIA mind control inhumanity, the CIA was finding covert ways to make it even dirtier. Not content with forcing “subjects” to take LSD, the CIA took to slipping it to people without their knowing it. In December of 1952, a man named George Hunter White was beginning operations in Greenwich Village at a CIA “safe house”—an oxymoron in this case if there ever was one. White was using prostitutes to lure unsuspecting men to the gaudy apartment, where they would be slipped doses of LSD, and would be induced into a variety of sex acts. White would film what happened through a two-way mirror for the edification of the CIA. (Your tax dollars at work.) White later would move his operation to the Haight-Ashbury section of San Francisco. The SF Weekly reported about White’s perverted project in a 2012 article, “Operation Midnight Climax: How the CIA Dosed S.F. Citizens with LSD”:

There were at least three CIA safe houses in the Bay Area where experiments went on. Chief among them was 225 Chestnut on Telegraph Hill, which operated from 1955 to 1965. The L-shaped apartment boasted sweeping waterfront views, and was just a short trip up the hill from North Beach’s rowdy saloons. Inside, prostitutes paid by the government to lure clients to the apartment served up acid-laced cocktails to unsuspecting johns, while martini- swilling secret agents observed their every move from behind a two-way mirror. Recording devices were installed, some disguised as electrical outlets.

To get the guys in the mood, the walls were adorned with photographs of tortured women in bondage and provocative posters from French artist Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec. The agents grew fascinated with the kinky sex games that played out between the johns and the hookers. The two-way mirror in the bedroom gave the agents a close-up view of all the action.

The CIA’s abuse of unsuspecting civilians with LSD wasn’t limited to White’s tax-funded pads of perversion, or even to the United States. The sad story of an artist named Stanley Glickman is told in the ruling of a civil suit brought on his behalf against the CIA’s mind-control masterminds, Sidney Gottlieb and Richard Helms. [In this book, the court’s footnotes and citations to case law have been removed for flow of the narrative; the full document is available on the Internet. —Ed.] :

In October 1952, Stanley Milton Glickman was pursuing a promising career as an artist in Paris, having had one of his works accepted for exhibition at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City.

One evening after he had finished his day’s work, Glickman arrived at a cafe he frequented and was approached by an acquaintance, who wanted him to meet some American friends across the street at the Cafe Select. Glickman met the American men at their table and then engaged in “several hours of hostile debate,” focusing on “power, patriotism, and changing the world to conform with their personal beliefs.”

When Glickman prepared to leave, the “chief protagonist” among the Americans offered him a drink as a conciliatory gesture. Glickman initially declined but yielded after the man persisted through “obnoxious pressure.” Rather than call over the waiter, the man walked to the bar to get the drink. [Glickman] observed that the man had a clubfoot.

Halfway through the drink, Glickman “began to experience a lengthening of distance and a distortion of [his] perception,” and he noticed that “the faces of the gentlemen flushed with excitement as they watched the execution of the drink.” The man with the clubfoot steered the conversation to “the working of miracles” and suggested that Glickman “surely [. . .] would be capable of this power.” Glickman declined, then emptied his glass and said good night.

He then experienced colors and lights that had “changed” and “distant figures following [his] difficult path home.” He believed that he had been poisoned, and awoke the next morning “hallucinating intensely.” Glickman states that “the effects of the drink would today be described as a classic LSD experience.”

Over the next two weeks, Glickman “wandered in the pain of madness, delusion and terror,” ultimately returning to the Cafe Select and deliberately closing his eyes to “wait for ‘someone’ to come and tell me what had happened.” With his eyes remaining closed, Glickman was carried from the cafe, placed in an automobile and taken to the American Hospital in Paris on November 11, 1952.

After two brief stays in the hospital, during which he claims he was administered electroshock via catheter and “large doses” of “hallucinatory drugs,” a friend helped him sign out of the hospital and return to his studio. Over the next ten months Glickman remained mostly in his studio with his continuing “madness,” experiencing “stress, terror, hallucination and difficulty eating.” Glickman’s family helped him to return to the United States in July 1953.

After returning to this country, Glickman was cared for by family members and doctors to the extent that his physical condition but not his mental condition was improved. During the next twenty-five years of his life, Glickman gradually became “functional” and held various jobs, but he never painted again and was unable to maintain any normal social life.

Despite copious evidence of the CIA having engaged in just such activity with others, Glickman’s lawsuit was thrown out on a technicality.

On 13 April 1953, the CIA’s name-changing shell game had dubbed the mind-control projects as MK-ULTRA, a name it would keep into the 1970s. Under the new name, the program was a pet project of Richard Helms, then the Chief of Operations in the CIA’s Directorate for Plans. The head of the project, answering to Helms, was the CIA’s man with the club foot, the morally detached Sidney Gottlieb.

In the early days of MK-ULTRA, one of the CIA’s own biological warfare scientists, Frank Olson, wasn’t as lucky as Stanley Glickman had been. On 19 November 1953, Gottlieb slipped LSD into Cointreau served to a number of CIA associates who had gone for a weekend at the Deep Creek Lodge, including Frank Olson. Olson thought he was going insane—which he was, except he didn’t realize it was drug-induced insanity. Olson went into a state of extreme paranoia and suffered a mental breakdown. The CIA shuffled him from place to place in the “care” of Gottlieb’s deputy, Robert Lashbrook, having Olson seen by one of their own pet medicos, but the man’s condition worsened. At about 2:30 a.m. on 28 November 1953, Olson crashed through a window on the 13th floor of the Hotel Statler in New York City, where he and Lashbrook had been staying. It was not a soft landing. Sheffield Edwards, the CIA’s Chief of Security at the time, sent a certain CIA security employee to the Statler to help Lashbrook with the cover-up in the aftermath of Olson’s death plunge. The agent’s name should be familiar:

According to his typed report, stamped “SECRET” and dated five days later, James McCord knocked on the door of Room 488 at New York’s Statler Hotel around 7:50A.M. on November 28th, only about five hours after Frank Olson had died.

The initial ruling was suicide, and the matter was hushed up for decades, until 29 January 1975, when the CIA incautiously created a “Memorandum for the Record” to give to Justice Department attorneys who were doing an investigation into a series of articles about the CIA written by Seymour Hersch. Gottlieb’s LSD complicity emerged from the investigation.

The CIA settled with Olson’s family in 1975 for $750,000 [$3,393,236.99 in 2015 dollars]. Years later, Frank Olson’s son Eric Olson had his father’s body exhumed. An autopsy and an on-site investigation at the Hotel Pennsylvania—formerly the Hotel Statler—was conducted by a team headed by James Starrs, a professor of law and forensic science at the George Washington University Law Center. The team discovered a hematoma that was evidence of blunt force trauma to Frank Olson’s head. Near the end of Starrs’ report, he wrote:

In the present state of our factual knowledge about the death of Dr. Olson, I would venture to say that this hematoma is singular evidence of the possibility that Dr. Olson was struck a stunning blow to the head by some person or instrument prior to his exiting through the window of Room 1018A.

Starrs added that the composite of the evidence was “rankly and starkly suggestive of homicide,” but he and his team had encountered the CIA trademark confessions, confessions, and more confessions that were, of course, lies, lies, and more lies:

It is well-nigh impossible to separate the truth from the fabrications in the documentary evidence we have exhaustingly and exhaustively reviewed. In 1953 the lies outpaced the truth by a mile. Not only were these lies told patently to conceal the full nature of the CIA’s involvement in behavioral modification experiments through the use of drugs, only one of which was LSD, but the lies were also motivated by a calculated effort to keep the Olson family in the dark and from becoming suspicious, by providing the necessary foundation for an award of a federal employee death benefit to Dr. Olson’s survivors.

The extent to which this manhandling of the truth also evolved from a desperate concern lest a homicide by the CIA be revealed is beyond the ability of anyone but the possible malefactors to say.

The CIA was so rabid in its foaming pursuit and distribution of LSD that by early 1953 it had arranged for one of its many corporate prostitutes, the Eli Lilly Company, to synthesize it for them—illegally, according to a CIA “memo for the record” of 3 February 1953 by Robert Lashbrook, the same man who was with Frank Olson at the time of Olson’s death:

Since the unusual properties of ergot and, more importantly, Lysergic Acid [LSD] have been known to ARTICHOKE for some time, the development of this chemical has been of intense interest. . . . For matters of record, apparently chemists of the Eli Lilly Company working for [CIA’s Technical Services Staff] have in the past few weeks succeeded in breaking the secret formula held by Sandoz for the manufacture of Lysergic Acid and have manufactured for this Agency a large quantity of Lysergic Acid which is available for our experimentation. This work is a closely guarded [TSS] secret and should not be mentioned generally.

How far did the CIA and its pack of psycho-establishment mind control minions go? Consider the testimony of one Claudia Mullen before a 1995 Presidential commission investigating CIA experiments in radiation on human subjects:

Between the years 1957 and 1984 I became a pawn in the government’s game. Its ultimate goal was mind control and to create the perfect spy, all through the use of chemicals, radiation, drugs, hypnosis, electric shock, isolation in tubs of water, sleep deprivation, brainwashing, verbal, physical, emotional and sexual abuse. I was exploited unwittingly for nearly three decades of my life and the only explanations given to me were “that the end justifies the means” and “I was serving my country in their bold effort to fight communism.”

I can only summarize my circumstances by saying they took an already abused 7-year- old child and compounded my suffering beyond belief. The saddest part is, I know for a fact I was not alone.

Many books have been written solely to increase public awareness of the ineffable abuses carried out by the CIA and the psycho-establishment, and every concerned American should read them. They include, but are not limited to, The Search for the Manchurian Candidate, by John Marks; Acid Dreams, by Martin A. Lee and Bruce Shlain; A Terrible Mistake—The Murder of Frank Olson and the CIA’s Secret Cold War Experiments, by H.P. Alberelli, Jr.; and The CIA Doctors—Human Rights Violations by American Psychiatrists, by Colin M. Ross, M.D.

Ross has exhaustively cataloged the limited available documentation on the CIA mind control experiments. The reason it’s limited is because in January of 1973—just months after the CIA contract with the Scientology OTs—Sidney Gottlieb and the Sophisticated Butcher Richard Helms conspired to destroy the bulk of CIA records on the mind control programs. Ross has chapters on CIA-sponsored sadists such as Dr. Ewen Cameron, who benefitted from Rockefeller sponsorship, and Louis Jolyon “Jolly” West, who once killed an elephant with LSD. Ross describes some of Ewen Cameron’s “psychic driving” experiments:

Psychic driving was a procedure carried out in two stages; in the first stage, patients were depatterned, which meant they were reduced to a vegetable state through a combination of massive amounts of electroconvulsive shock, drug-induced sleep, and sensory isolation and deprivation. When fully depatterned, patients were incontinent of urine and feces, unable to feed themselves, and unable to state their name, age, location, or the current date.

In the second stage, psychic driving was introduced. This consisted of hundreds of hours of tape loops being played to the patient through earphones, special helmets or speakers in the sensory isolation room. The tape loops repeated statements of supposed psychological significance.

Ross, in the introduction to his book, curiously stands up for the CIA, laying all blame for the atrocities at the door of the psycho-establishment psychiatrists and institutions. While Ross deserves all accolades for his humanitarian work in exposing their abuses, he apparently has never made the observation that bunnies do not bed down with snakes.

Wherever anyone would like to lay the blame, the fact of the CIA having been in a decades long war—that continues right now—to control the minds of men, both individually and collectively, is inarguable.

It’s also inarguable that the enemy in its war never was the Soviet Union during the so-called Cold War. That is a specious argument because both nations were working toward the same goal: enslavement of the minds of men. They were on the same side.

They both had one common enemy, though: L. Ron Hubbard. He had turned them both down when they attempted to lure or conscript him into their service to use Dianetics or Scientology for mind control. By 1955, he reported to the FBI that there had been three attempts by the Russians to lure him into coming there and working for them, even promising him the use of Pavlov’s laboratories. In that same year, in a Professional Auditor’s Bulletin article titled “Psychiatrists,” Hubbard gave a glimpse of the consequences that had befallen Dianetics and Scientology organizations—perfectly reflecting the exact types of actions that the CIA and the psycho-establishment were involved in at the time, but which wouldn’t be publically exposed for 20 more years:

I could tell you about long strings of psychotics run in on the [Dianetics] Foundation and the [Scientology] Association, sent in to us by psychiatrists who then, using LSD and pain-drug- hypnosis, spun them and told everyone Dianetics and Scientology drove people insane.

There’s no question that the agency behind such tactics aimed at Hubbard was the Agency: the CIA. It was the major “pusher” for the world’s supply of LSD, and would soon flood it all over the country through its drug distribution network of psychiatrists, mafia hoods, and other scum that did its bidding.

That same year, 1955, the deadly serious operations by the CIA-Cult against Hubbard and Scientology became almost comical in the way Hubbard seemed to play cat-and- mouse with them. That is illustrated by one brief timeline:

15 c. March 1955
Hubbard sends a dispatch by wire to the US Department of Defense, “concerning a solution to brainwashing.” [NOTE: Later events imply that Hubbard may have been “dying the waters” to see where such a suggestion would lead. It led to an attack by the IRS on the Hubbard Association of Scientologists in Phoenix, Arizona, closing its doors. It would not be the last time that the US sicced the IRS dawgs on Scientology. —Ed.]

11 July 1955
Hubbard notifies the FBI of the dispatch sent in March 1955 to the US Department of Defense about a solution to brainwashing.

15 August 1955
Just over a month after Hubbard’s letter to the FBI about brainwashing, the staff of CIA Director Allen W. Dulles completes a classified report entitled “A Report on Communist Brainwashing.”

4 September 1955
Less than three weeks after the CIA produced its internal report, Hubbard sends a letter off to a printer in Wichita, Kansas, ordering 2,000 copies of a saddle-stitched softcover book that would later become famous as “The Brainwashing Manual,” its official title being, “Brain- Washing: A Synthesis of the Russian Textbook on Psychopolitics.” [NOTE: There have been accusations and popular speculation that Hubbard himself wrote the booklet to expose how the psycho-establishment worked both sides of the Cold War, but he never claimed authorship and it has never been proven. —Ed.]

7 September 1955
Hubbard sends another letter to the FBI, this time almost openly taunting them about his having gotten the jump on and having one-upped the Department of Defense and the CIA: “I am getting additional copies of the material which was offered to the Defense Department since that agency has not acknowledged or returned anything shipped to it about brain- washing [sic: brainwashing], and when I have these copies I will send one to you, for this is the only starting place I know about for this outbreak [emphasis added], and the matter, while far from conclusive, at least tells me that something went astray which was dangerous in the wrong hands [emphasis added].”

Had Hubbard known exactly what was being done inside the hallowed halls of the FBI, Langley CIA Headquarters, and the Department of Defense concerning brainwashing? There’s no way of knowing for certain, but it must have been a source of embarrassment for FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover that Hubbard had sent these letters and the “Brainwashing Manual” to the FBI, but CIA Director Dulles didn’t send Hoover a copy of the CIA’s own report on brainwashing for seven more months, on 25 April 1956.

Hubbard resolutely refused to allow any government to gain any monopoly on Dianetics or Scientology, and when he later developed the secret Scientology OT Levels, he slammed the door on government intelligence agencies ever getting their hands on them—that is, until Hal Puthoff, Ingo Swann, Pat Price, and Watergate came along.

In a 10 April 1953 talk to a Princeton University National Alumni Conference, the Director of Central Intelligence, Allen W. Dulles, wondered aloud if the people of the United States realized “how sinister the battle for men’s minds” had become “in Soviet hands.” It was typical of the disingenuous in-your-face arrogance of Dulles and his cronies, because it was a foreshadowing of how sinister the battle for men’s minds would become in the hands of Dulles, his CIA gang of criminals, and his successor directors as they carried out their own unspeakable atrocities against humankind. Those atrocities ramped up to a whole new level just three days after the Dulles talk at Princeton—on Monday, 13 April 1953, when Dulles unleashed the CIA’s MK-ULTRA, a program of premeditated torture and brutality dreamed up by Richard Helms.

As amoral and repulsive as the battle for men’s minds was, it only ran second to the CIA’s battle for men’s souls.

 

 

Watergate: The Hoax is available now
at Amazon, iBooks and 
Barnes & Noble.
Order it today!

Rewrite history with the truth!

 

read more

Wikipedia’s Big-Brother Doublethink Brigade Censors and Bans “Watergate: The Hoax”

Sunday, 17 December 2017 by

Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.
― George Orwell, 1984

We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.
—William Casey, Director of Central Intelligence

It has recently been brought to our attention that on 15 May 2017, a Wikipedia user named Celestia Jung made major, significant edits to Wikipedia’s “Watergate scandal” page. Before Jung’s edits, much of the page was pure fiction, a regurgitation of the same lame “Official Story” of Watergate that is hopelessly full of holes, lies, and impossible contradictions—all of them exposed for what they are in Ashton Gray’s Watergate: The Hoax.

According to Wikipedia’s own records of the change-history of the article, Celestia Jung added 26 references as citations in the article, and laid out an exceptionally well-researched and factually accurate account of facts about Watergate that—unfortunately for Watergate disinformation specialists—blow the “Official Story” to shreds. The added references included, for example, vitally important FBI documents, Congressional testimony, and legal depositions. Among the references, Jung also included citations to Gray’s 600-page groundbreaking exposé, Watergate: The Hoax. That book alone contains almost 500 citations to crucial government documents and private papers, some of them never before published.

The pack of disinformation jackals at Wikipedia completely eradicated Celestia Jung’s edits, censored and banned Watergate: The Hoax as a source, and then threatened to ban Celestia Jung’s account.

Because of the importance of the incontrovertible facts we have found to have been laid out in Celestia Jung’s edits and additions to the Wikipedia “Watergate scandal” page, we are going to reproduce it here just as it appeared on Wikipedia, including the citations and references. NOTE: Because of problems in the conversion process from the Wikipedia version to this blog software, we have renumbered the footnotes in order to include only those germane to the section that Celestia Jung had edited:

Break-ins and wiretaps at the DNC’s Watergate headquarters

The “Gemstone” plans

In early 1972, G. Gordon Liddy, having recently been appointed as Finance Counsel for the Committee for the Re-Election of the President (CRP), presented three different versions of a campaign intelligence plan, seeking approval and funding from CRP. E. Howard Hunt, a veteran of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency who was working as a “consultant” to the White House at the time, aided Liddy in his presentations. Liddy and Hunt gave the plans a code name: “Gemstone.” Whether any version of the plan was approved has been contested in sworn testimony by those involved, and no documented proof of any approval ever has been in evidence.[1][2][3]:393-403

Gemstone 1

On Thursday, 27 January 1972, Liddy made his first Gemstone presentation to CRP’s Acting Chairman Jeb Stuart Magruder, Attorney General John Mitchell, and Presidential Counsel John Dean. It involved extensive illegal activities against the Democratic Party. According to the CIA, Liddy, at the time, was under “special clearances” from the CIA.[4] E. Howard Hunt arranged for the CIA to create elaborate charts used in Liddy’s presentation.[2] According to Dean, this marked “the opening scene of the worst political scandal of the twentieth century and the beginning of the end of the Nixon presidency”.[5] Mitchell viewed the plan as unrealistic and refused to approve it.

Gemstone 2

The second Liddy presentation to Mitchell, Dean, and Magruder for proposed political intelligence activities was made on Friday, 4 February 1972, and the budget had been reduced to $500,000. Liddy has sworn under oath that the Democratic National Committee‘s (DNC) headquarters at the Watergate Complex in Washington, D.C. was not a proposed target for any “surreptitious entry” or electronic surveillance in the 4 February 1972 proposal, or in any plan he ever submitted.[2] John Mitchell declined to approve the second proposal.[1]

Gemstone 3

In Congressional testimony, Magruder alleged that Mitchell approved a third version of Liddy’s plan on Thursday, 30 March 1972, while staying in Key Biscayne, Florida. Magruder also alleged that part of the plan was to break into the DNC headquarters at the Watergate—ostensibly to photograph campaign documents and install listening devices in telephones. (Magruder later was convicted of and sentenced to jail for perjury.) Mitchell denied in sworn testimony that he ever approved any Liddy plan at all.[1] According to Liddy, Magruder alone, in a closed-door meeting in Magruder’s office at “the end of April” 1972, ordered him to organize a break-in at DNC headquarters to plant electronic “bugs” and to photograph documents.[2] Liddy was nominally in charge of the operation, but has since insisted that he was duped by Dean and at least two of his subordinates. These included former CIA officers E. Howard Hunt and James McCord, then-CRP Security Coordinator. (John Mitchell had by then resigned as Attorney General to become chairman of the CRP.)[6]

Set-up for “first break-in”

On or about Friday, 31 March 1972, James McCord placed a phone call to the Watkins-Johnson Company, Communications Electronics Incorporated (CEI) division, in Rockville, Maryland, to inquire about surveillance receivers. A salesman named John Bussler said that CEI had one like McCord wanted, a Receiving System Type RS-111-1B-12, but that it had to be refurbished, so McCord should call back in a few weeks.[7]

On Thursday, 20 April 1972, James McCord went to the Howard Johnson motel across the street from the Watergate complex and placed a deposit on room 419, which faced DNC headquarters. He reserved it in the name of his own company, McCord Associates, and said he would be back soon to actually book the dates he would have it.[8] The call to Watkins-Johnson and the deposit on room 419 were prior to the alleged closed-door meeting between Magruder and Liddy at the “end of April,” indicating that McCord already was planning an operation involving DNC headquarters at the Watergate before any order was issued for a break-in there.[3]:78-81

On Monday, 24 April 1972, McCord placed an order with Bell & Howell for four Kelcom III transceivers, or walkie-talkies. Although the walkie-talkies were ostensibly for security at the upcoming Republican National Convention, then planned for San Diego, California, McCord specified on the order frequencies for usage exclusively in Washington, D.C.[9] This is further evidence of McCord’s prior knowledge of plans for a clandestine operation in D.C.[3]:80-81

On Monday, 1 May 1972, McCord again called the Watkins-Johnson Company, CEI division, seeking information on the surveillance receiver he had called about earlier—which could be used to monitor electronic eavesdropping devices. He arranged with salesman Roy Scherrer to come pick it up soon and to pay cash for it.[10]

Later on 1 May, McCord placed a late-night phone call to a former FBI agent living in Connecticut named Alfred C. Baldwin III. McCord hired Baldwin sight-unseen, over the phone, offering Baldwin work in Washington, D.C., starting the following morning. McCord testified in Congress that he had selected Baldwin’s name from a registry published by the Society of Former Special Agents of the FBI to work for CRP, but investigative reporter Jim Hougan has described Baldwin as “somehow special and perhaps well known to McCord.”[11]:135 Investigative author Ashton Gray says that the weight of evidence “supports the conclusion that Baldwin had been hand-selected well in advance by CIA.”[3]:34 Baldwin ultimately would be assigned by McCord to use the surveillance receiver McCord had arranged that day to purchase.

Baldwin arrived in D.C. the following morning, 2 May, and initially served as a bodyguard to Martha Mitchell, the wife of John Mitchell, who was living in Washington. Baldwin accompanied Mrs. Mitchell on a trip to the Midwest and to New York for six days.[3]:34-35 On Friday, 5 May, while Baldwin was away, McCord went back to the Howard Johnson and activated his deposit to rent room 419, giving an “in date” of 5 May, even though McCord had reserved it with a deposit over two weeks earlier.[3]:87

Baldwin returned to D.C. with Martha Mitchell on Monday, 8 May. On their return, Mrs. Mitchell described Baldwin as “the gauchest character I’ve ever met,”[11]:136 saying to her personal secretary that he was “pushy, vocal, and someone who would not stay in the background.”[12] McCord relieved Baldwin of bodyguard duties for Mrs. Mitchell, instructing him to stay in room 419 at the Howard Johnson’s motel across the street from the Watergate complex. According to records of the FBI, McCord was directly paying Baldwin in cash, as well as paying for the motel room. In a little over six weeks, McCord gave Baldwin cash amounts totaling at least $2,200—which in 2017 dollars is equivalent to over $12,800.[3]:75

On Wednesday, 10 May 1972, McCord traveled to Rockville, Maryland, where he purchased the CEI Receiving System Type RS-111-1B-12, serial number 132, from Watkins-Johnson Company, paying $3,500 in cash. (That is approximately $20,400 in 2017 dollars.) It is the only such receiver McCord bought. He described it in Congressional testimony as “a very sophisticated and complex receiver with what is called a very high degree of sensitivity; that is, it is capable of picking up very weak transmissions.” It could only pick up signals from one transmitter at a time.[4]

On Monday, 22 May 1972, six men from Miami arrived by plane in Washington, D.C. They had been “recruited” by Hunt and Liddy to carry out a mission in D.C. They were: Bernard Barker, Eugenio Martínez, Virgilio Gonzales, Frank Sturgis, Renaldo Pico, and Filipe DeDiego. They all were traveling under aliases.[13] All of them had at one time worked for the CIA. One of them, Gonzales, was actively on CIA payroll and had a CIA case officer in Miami that he reported to. Gonzales was a locksmith and had been “recruited” by Liddy and Hunt to pick locks.[3]:xvi-xvii[4]

The “first break-in” at DNC headquarters—Memorial Day weekend 1972

According to Congressional and court testimony by the perpetrators—much of it irreconcilably contradictory—three separate attempts were made to break in to DNC headquarters in the Watergate over Memorial Day weekend in 1972: 26, 27, and 28 May. The first two attempts ostensibly failed. The third attempt purportedly was successful.[11]:139-157

Friday, 26 May 1972: The “Ameritas dinner” break-in attempt

Baldwin claimed in his Congressional testimony that on 26 May, he drove from Hamden, Connecticut, where he had gone to pick up his car, to Washington, D.C.—a distance of about 300 miles (500 km)—returning to room 419 at the Howard Johnson motel across from the Watergate. From Baldwin’s testimony:

ALFRED BALDWIN: When I entered the room, there were numerous items of electronic equipment in the room. When I entered the room, it was approximately 2 in the afternoon, I believe, about that hour. Mr. McCord was in the room and operating one of the receiver units. At that time, I did not know what it was. He explained it.

— Alfred Baldwin testimony, U.S. Congress[14]

Baldwin went on to claim in testimony that Hunt and Liddy came to room 419 that afternoon, and McCord introduced them to each other. Baldwin also claimed that he was there at the motel that night with McCord when an alleged first attempt to break into the DNC headquarters took place.

Yet the FBI located an eyewitness who emphatically placed Baldwin 300 miles (500 km) away, in Hamden, Connecticut, that night, at a social event:

John S. Dantscher . . . said [that] on the evening of May 26, 1972, he and his wife attended a social gathering at the home of Walter Walsh, 126 Bedford Avenue, Hamden, Connecticut, which was also attended by Walsh’s mother, Alfred Baldwin, and John Dantscher’s mother. During this social affair Baldwin presented Dantscher and his wife with photographs taken at their wedding.

— SAs Emmett J. Michaels and SA Robert C. Puckett, Federal Bureau of Investigation[15]

During re-interview . . . Dantscher again referred to personal date book and confirmed date of social affair as May 26 . . . He stated that according to his own notations in date book, he attended business affair at local high school on May 24; on May 25 he attended a dinner engagement with other friends; and on May 27 he departed New Haven area on weekend cruise in Atlantic Ocean. He is positive event attended by Baldwin at Walsh home was held on Friday, May 26 1972.

— Special Agent in Charge, New Haven, Federal Bureau of Investigation[16][3]:38, 111

Bernard Barker had scheduled a dinner for “businessmen” to be held that Friday night, 26 May, in the Watergate complex’s Continental Room, which had a door connecting to a corridor leading to elevators and stairs. Barker had booked the room in the name of a shell corporation he had set up in Florida: Ameritas, Inc. According to Congressional and courtroom testimony by the perpetrators, plus personal accounts and autobiographies, the plan was to stretch out the dinner until there was an opportunity for the men to slip through the connecting door and gain access to the DNC headquarters by staircase or elevator. “The key” to the plan according to Liddy, was for McCord to disable an alarm on the connecting door, but McCord didn’t show up for the dinner, so didn’t disable the alarm, which is what supposedly foiled the plan.[3]:107-123 Jim Hougan, though, established that no alarm ever had existed on the connecting door at all.[11]:145

Liddy claimed in his autobiography, Will, that he was at the dinner, and ate McCord’s meal. Later, though, Liddy said under oath that he “was not at that dinner.”[2]

Hunt claimed in testimony and in his autobiography that he inadvertently had gotten locked inside the Continental Room, along with lockpicker Virgilio Gonzales, and that both men spent the night locked up there until they were able to slip out after daybreak—purportedly because of the alarm (which never existed). Gonzales gave similar testimony in Congress.[17][18][11]:139-148[3]:107-123 Yet Alfred Baldwin claimed that he saw Hunt in a car later that night outside McGovern headquarters in D.C.[19][3]:125-134

Concerning the many contradictions in the co-conspirators’ claims about that night, Hougan says: “Clearly, a hoax is in the works. For whatever reason, Hunt and Gonzalez [sic, Gonzales] have connived with McCord—and perhaps with others—to lie about their activities and whereabouts.”[11]:148 Gray says the reason was “to give James McCord, E. Howard Hunt, and G. Gordon Liddy alibis for their whereabouts on Memorial Day weekend 1972.”[3]:73

Saturday, 27 May 1972: The “wrong lockpicks” break-in attempt

According to conflicting accounts by several of the co-conspiritors in testimony and autobiographies, a “second attempt” to break into DNC headquarters was made during the night of Saturday, 27 May 1972. Ostensibly, the would-be burglars managed to get inside the Watergate complex through a door in the parking garage, and up to the floor where DNC headquarters were, but the break-in attempt failed because Virgilio Gonzales had brought the wrong lockpicks. Hunt and Liddy claim that he was put on a plane to fly back to Miami that day and get the correct lockpicks.[11]:148-151[3]:134-140 According to Gray: “Other than the testimony of the co-conspirators, there is no evidence to support or verify any of the accounts of a second break-in attempt on the night of Saturday, 27 May 1972.”

Sunday, 28 May 1972: The “successful” break-in attempt

The Watergate co-conspirators have claimed that on the night of 28 May 1972, they successfully entered the Watergate complex and made their way to DNC headquarters, where Gonzales successfully picked the lock on the front door, gaining them entrance.[4]

McCord claims to have planted two electronic eavesdropping devices—or “bugs”—on phones in DNC headquarters that night, but he has contradicted himself in different accounts, and has contradicted Liddy, who ostensibly had set the priorities and “targets” for the bugs.[3]:41-50, 141-149 In Congressional testimony, McCord said he’d had instructions from Liddy to place one bug on “specifically, Mr. O’Brien’s telephone extension,” and to install the other where it “might provide information of interest.” [4] Larry O’Brien was the national chairman of the Democratic National Committee—but O’Brien had “moved his offices, and most of his files” to Miami at the time.[11]:81 In McCord’s autobiographical account A Piece of Tape, he claimed he had been asked by Liddy to “install only one device,” but had brought along another as “insurance,” in case it was needed. According to McCord’s accounts, he placed the first bug on the telephone of Robert Spencer Oliver, who was the executive director of the Association of State Democratic Chairmen, not on O’Brien’s phone, then planted the “insurance” bug on an extension that McCord says was O’Brien’s.[3]:41-50, 141-149

Liddy has claimed that there never were any instructions for McCord to plant two phone bugs. According to his testimony under oath:

LIDDY: So far as I understood, they did what they were supposed to do, which was to place a tap on the telephone in the office of Lawrence O’Brien and to place a room monitoring device in the office of Lawrence O’Brien. … There were two things they were to do. One was the telephone of Larry O’Brien, wiretap, and the other was a room monitoring device of Larry O’Brien’s office.

— G. Gordon Liddy, videotaped deposition[2]

Regardless of the claimed number of bugs or locations, McCord had purchased only one receiver that could pick up a signal from any such bug, and it could only receive from one bug at a time, monitored through headphones. According to McCord’s claims in Congressional testimony, it took him “about two days” to tune in even one such bug, and McCord had experience with such electronic devices. It would have been impossible for Baldwin, or anyone, to monitor two such bugs, even if more than one bug ever had been installed and working.[3]:41-50

The FBI found no evidence that O’Brien’s phone ever was bugged.[20] In fact, the only independent evidence that ever has existed concerning the alleged bugs came from two separate and thorough security surveys of DNC headquarters instigated by the FBI. The first was conducted by the Chief of Security of the Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company—who had installed the phones—on Saturday, 17 June and Sunday, 18 June 1972. They physically inspected “all telephone installations and telephone equipment” in the DNC, and reported to the FBI that no bugs were found. Another thorough inspection was conducted by “technically trained agents of the FBI Laboratory” on Thursday, 29 June and Friday, 30 June 1972. They found no “electronic surveillance equipment.”[13][3]:41-50, 141-149

Neither the FBI nor any trier of fact ever had any physical evidence that any such “first break-in” of DNC headquarters actually took place, or that any bugs ever were planted in DNC over Memorial Day weekend 1972; the only evidence ever used consisted of the conflicting and contradictory “confessions” and testimony of the co-conspirators themselves.[3]:73-151

Alleged “photographs” of the “first break-in”

On 22 June 1972, the FBI located a witness named Michael Richardson who said he had developed and printed 38 exposed negatives at a photography processing shop in Miami. The film had been dropped off there on 10 June by Bernard Barker, one of the Watergate co-conspirators. According to Richardson, the photos were of documents that were “headed Chairman Democratic National Committee,” and a few of them had the name of Lawrence O’Brien on them. Richardson said that the documents had been photographed while being held down on a shag carpet by hands wearing “clear type gloves.”[21]

There was no shag carpet anywhere in DNC headquarters, or in the motel rooms that had been occupied by Barker and his fellow co-conspirators during the Memorial Day weekend operation.[11]:156-157

Also, while Barker claimed in his Congressional testimony that he and Martinez had been assigned to photograph documents during the purported “first break-in,” he also said that they never had been in Lawrence O’Brien’s office.[4][3]:580

The photographs that Michael Richardson described to the FBI were never found or submitted as physical evidence in any trial or hearing.

Alleged Baldwin “logs” of wiretaps

Alfred Baldwin claims that on McCord’s orders, he used the CEI Receiving System Type RS-111-1B-12 during the several weeks between 29 May and 17 June 1972 to monitor one bug in DNC headquarters, ostensibly one planted on the phone of Spencer Oliver. Liddy, McCord, and Baldwin all claim that one of the two purported bugs wasn’t working—which was convenient, because Baldwin only had one receiver to monitor.[4][3]:41-50, 141-149

Baldwin also claimed that as part of his monitoring duties, he made “logs”—at first by hand, then using an electric typewriter that McCord furnished—to document the phone conversations he was eavesdropping on. In Congressional testimony, Baldwin claimed under oath that he typed the conversations “almost verbatim” as he was listening to them through headphones:

SENATOR ERVIN: The information you got while you were at the Howard Johnson from the Democratic headquarters, what form was it in when you gave it to Mr. McCord?

ALFRED BALDWIN: The initial day, the first day that I recorded the conversations was on a yellow sheet. On Memorial Day … when he returned to the room he brought an electric typewriter, he instructed me in the upper left-hand corner to print, or by typewriter, the unit, the date, the page and then proceed down into the body and in chronological order put the time and then the contents of the conversation. I used— As unit I used the exact frequency that we were monitoring, and after about two days Mr. McCord came back and said change that; anybody reading these things is going to know the frequency.

SENATOR ERVIN: And you typed a summary of the conversations you overheard?

ALFRED BALDWIN: Well, they weren’t exactly a summary, I would say almost verbatim, Senator.

SENATOR ERVIN: Almost verbatim.

— Alfred Baldwin III, U.S. Congress, testimony of witnesses[4]

Only Liddy, McCord, and Baldwin ever claimed to have seen the purported Baldwin logs, and no such logs have ever been in evidence in any trial or hearing. According to Liddy, he destroyed them. Liddy’s secretary Sally Harmony testified in Congress that she typed up logs that she thought might have come from eavesdropped conversations, but she did not type them from any logs created by Baldwin; she typed out logs that Liddy had dictated for her to type.[4][3]:51-70

The 16-17 June 1972 break-in

G. Gordon Liddy has claimed in sworn testimony that on 12 June 1972, in another closed-door meeting, Jeb Magruder, and Magruder alone, ordered him to “go back into” DNC headquarters, purportedly to “fix” a defective bug,[22] and to photograph documents in Lawrence O’Brien’s desk.[2]

As for the allegedly defective bug, McCord only had purchased one receiver usable for that kind of monitoring, so attempting to install or fix a second bug would have been pointless—if there had been any bugs in DNC headquarters at all, but the FBI never found any. [23] As for O’Brien’s desk, O’Brien had relocated his operations to Miami in preparation for the upcoming Democratic National Convention.

Nevertheless, five of the co-conspirators broke into DNC headquarters during the night of Friday, 16 June, continuing into the early hours of Saturday, 17 June: James McCord, Bernard Barker, Virgilio Gonzales, Eugenio Martinez, and Frank Sturgis. This time, they didn’t bother with the finesse of Gonzales picking the DNC headquarters door lock; they took it off its hinges.[11]:198[3]:446

Shortly after midnight on June 17, 1972, Frank Wills, a security guard at the Watergate Complex, noticed tape covering the latches on some of the doors in the complex staircase leading from the underground parking garage to several offices (allowing the doors to close but remain unlocked). He removed the tape, thinking that it might have been maintenance crews. But when he returned an hour later and discovered that someone had retaped the locks, Wills called the police. McCord had done the retaping, even knowing that Wills would be making rounds again.[11]:185-204 Hougan says: “The conclusion is inescapable that McCord sabotaged the June 16 break-in to protect an ongoing CIA operation.”[11]:212

The five men were discovered inside the DNC office and arrested. Although McCord had electronic equipment on him at the time of his arrest, and other electronic equipment later was discovered in Hunt’s White House safe, none of it ever had been installed in DNC headquarters. Gray has described the equipment and other evidence found in the possession of the perpetrators as “theatrical props planted to be ‘found.'”[3]:62 Eventually they were charged with attempted burglary and attempted interception of telephone and other communications.

On September 15, a grand jury indicted them, as well as Hunt and Liddy,[24] for conspiracy, burglary, and violation of federal wiretapping laws. The five burglars who broke into the office were tried by a jury, Judge John Sirica officiating, and either pled guilty or were convicted on January 30, 1973.[25]

On the morning of 18 June 1972, G. Gordon Liddy called Jeb Magruder in Los Angeles and informed him that “the four men arrested with McCord were Cuban freedom fighters, whom Howard Hunt recruited.” Initially Nixon’s organization and the White House quickly went to work to cover up the crime and any evidence that might have damaged the president and his reelection.[26]

References

  1. ^ a b c Judiciary Committee Impeachment Inquiry (9 May 1974). Statement of Information; Events Prior to the Watergate Break-In, December 2, 1971-June 17, 1972
  2. ^ a b c d e f g Transcript of videotaped deposition of G. Gordon Liddy, 6 December 1996, United States District Court for the District of Columbia No. 92-1807: Maureen K. Dean and John W. Dean, Plaintiffs, v. St. Martin’s Press, Inc., Len Colodny, Robert Gettlin, G. Gordon Liddy, and Phillip Mackin Bailley, Defendants. Washington, D.C.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x Gray, Ashton (28 May 2016). Watergate: The Hoax. Chalet Books. ISBN 9780979960277. 
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h i U.S. Congress (1974). Testimony of witnesses: hearings before the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, Ninety-third congress, second session, pursuant to H. Res. 803, a resolution authorizing and directing the Committee on the Judiciary to investigate whether sufficient grounds exists for the House of Representatives to exercise its constitutional power to impeach Richard M. Nixon, President of the United States of America, Book III, 93rd Cong.
  5. ^ Dean, John W. The Nixon Defense, p. xvii, Penguin Group, 2014 ISBN 978-0-670-02536-7
  6. ^ a b Lawrence Meyer, “John N. Mitchell, Principal in Watergate, Dies at 75”, The Washington Post, November 10, 1988
  7. ^ FBI Report of 13 July 1972 by SA Dennis F. Hoffman, Rockville, Maryland, File # WFO 139-166
  8. ^ FBI (23 April 1973). Summary of Investigative Reports in the Case James Walter McCord, Jr., and Others, Burglary of Democratic National Committee Headquarters, June 17, 1972, Interception of Communications
  9. ^ FBI Teletype of 20 June 1972.
  10. ^ FBI Report of 13 July 1972 by SAs Dennis F. Hoffman and Michael J. King, Rockville, Maryland, File # WFO 139-166
  11. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Hougan, Jim (November 1984). Secret Agenda: Watergate, Deep Throat, and the CIA. Random House. ISBN 0394514289. 
  12. ^ FBI Report of 30 June 1972 by SAs Robert E. Lill and Donald E. Stukey II, Washington, D.C.
  13. ^ a b FBI Office of Planning and Evaluation (5 July 1974). Watergate Investigation, Analysis
  14. ^ U.S. Congress (1973). Presidential Campaign Activities of 1972, Senate Resolution 60, Book 1, 93rd Cong. (Testimony of Alfred C. Baldwin III)
  15. ^ FBI Report of 23 June 1972 by SA Emmett J. Michaels and SA Robert C. Puckett/RCP at Hamden, Connecticut, File # NH 139-74
  16. ^ FBI Teletype of 11 a.m. 26 July 1972 from SAC, New Haven (139-74) 2P to Acting Director, FBI (139-166) and SAC, WFO (139-4089)
  17. ^ E. Howard Hunt testimony, December 17, 1973; 13–15 Executive Session
  18. ^ Virgilio Gonzales testimony, December 10, 1973; 9–11 SSC Executive Session
  19. ^ Alfred Baldwin testimony, May 24, 1973; 1 SSC 399–401, 410–11
  20. ^ a b c d Jeff Stein (July 16, 2013). “Watergate Bugging-Again: Newly released wiretap list raises questions on ’72 break-in”. AND Magazine. Retrieved September 8, 2014. 
  21. ^ FBI Teletype of 22 June 1972
  22. ^ a b Robert Pear (June 14, 1992). “WATERGATE, THEN AND NOW; 2 Decades After a Political Burglary, the Questions Still Linger”. The New York Times. Retrieved May 18, 2015. 
  23. ^ NOTE: On 13 September 1972, months after the Watergate break-in, a bug was “discovered” on Spencer Oliver’s phone after a complaint by a secretary at DNC headquarters. The crime scene had been hopelessly compromised by that time, and according to FBI reports, the device was an old and unsophisticated “bug” with a very short range, and it was not operational. The FBI felt that the “discovery” was suspicious. According to Hougan, page 246: “The consensus of the experts whom the FBI questioned was that the device recovered from Oliver’s phone was a ‘throwaway’—a device installed to be found.”
  24. ^ Dickinson, William B.; Mercer Cross; Barry Polsky (1973). “Watergate: Chronology of a Crisis”. 1. Washington D. C.: Congressional Quarterly Inc.: 4. ISBN 0-87187-059-2. OCLC 20974031. 
  25. ^ Sirica, John J. (1979). To Set the Record Straight: The Break-in, the Tapes, the Conspirators, the Pardon. New York: Norton. p. 44. ISBN 0-393-01234-4. 
  26. ^ Genovese, Michael A. The Watergate Crisis. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group, 1999. p.4

Attack of Wikipedia’s Pack of Deep-State Disinformation Jackals

Celestia Jung’s accurate, factual, and very well-sourced work had hardly been on Wikipedia for 24 hours before it was under attack by its Big-Brother Thought Police. As a public service, we are going to reproduce here the exact messages from the “Talk” section of the Wikipedia “Watergate scandal” pages showing the depth of dishonesty, bigotry, and holier-than-thou disinformation censorship being run there:

Celestia Jung 21:33, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
I have made numerous edits to the first section, renaming it and rewriting much of it to reflect accurate and verifiable facts. In doing so, I added 26 new references, including Congressional documents and FBI reports. I also added many citations to some of those sources where the previous content had a lot of “citation needed” codes. I have made every good faith effort to make this a comprehensive and informative article in accordance with Wikipedia policies. A great deal of work has gone into this edit and finding reputable sources. Please consider carefully before undoing this work. Thanks.

Usernamekiran 22:11, 15 May 2017 (UTC) {{reply to|Celestia Jung}}
I didn’t read it carefully yet, but I skimmed through it. As far as I can tell, it is a good edit.

Celestia Jung 15:44, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Thank you. A lot of research and work went into it, and there is only so much time I can devote to it, but I hope to be able to enhance some of the other sections with solid citations, many of them directly from the FBI’s Watergate files.

Special:Contributionss/12.12.163.81 05:09, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Can someone please review the edits added by [[User:Celestia Jung]] between May 12 and 15? The contributions seem to be mostly or entirely sourced to ”Watergate: The Hoax”, a poorly referenced book which advances a Scientologist conspiracy theory that Watergate was a CIA operation to cover up an assassination attempt on L. Ron Hubbard.

Celestia Jung|talk]]) 17:42, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
“Poorly referenced”? You obviously don’t have or haven’t read the book. It is 600 pages long with 495 citations, many of them the original FBI documents, many of them ones that never have been published, analyzed, or cited in any other work on Watergate. Also, your allegation that my edits were “mostly or entirely” sourced from that book is false on its face. I cited at least 26 different sources in my edits, including Hougan’s “Secret Agenda,” quotations from actual Watergate legal proceedings and Congressional hearings, and quite a few of the original FBI reports. As for your “conspiracy theory” allegations, there is not a single word of any “conspiracy theory” in my edits. They contain solid, irrefutable facts, solidly sourced. My edits also don’t contain a single word about any “Scientologist” connection, so it sounds like you’re simply trying to foment a biased attack based on—well, based on nothing at all. Your comment is baseless and frivolous, and antipathetic to the intent of Talk pages. If you have a valid complaint about the content, then please refer specifically to which stated fact you challenge, and give a sound, rational reason for challenging it.

EDITED TO ADD: By the way, the entire government case, in court and Congress, was never anything but an elaborate “conspiracy theory.” If you have a non-conspiracy theory of Watergate, how about you present it for all of us? I sure would like to see it. Otherwise, it isn’t the fact of “conspiracy theory ” you object to; you just don’t want anything exposed or documented that might in any way damage your own “conspiracy theory.”

Special:Contribution|12.12.163.81 20:08, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Right. I see you also referenced the equally dubious ”Secret Agenda”, as well as several original documents. My concern is that you have inserted a great deal of heterodox analysis without flagging it as such, possibly including original research. Unfortunately, I don’t have the time to sort through it all at the moment, hence my plea for someone else to review it. I suppose I’ll get around to it eventually.

User:Location|Location 22:57, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Yeah, Ashton Gray and Jim Hougan are definitely not [[WP:RELIABLE SOURCES]]. On that alone those edits should be reverted entirely. This requires many more eyes than I have, so I’ve posted a notice at [[WP:FTN]].

Geogene|talk]]) 03:03, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Saw this on FNB. Manually reverted new additions that added info based on Fringe or Primary sources. There may be usable material that I removed, if so, it’s still in the article history.

CHALET REPORTS NOTE: All of Celestia Jung’s edits, additions, and references were wiped out, with the article reverted to its fantasy fiction. Jung attempted to reinstate the edits, additions, and references, which were promptly “reverted” to the original lies and disinformation. Jung was then threatened with having his or her account revoked if there were any more attempts to revert to Jung’s edited version of the facts. Jung then told them what they needed to hear:

Celestia Jung 06:31, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Those of you who have contributed to this “reversion” are not gatekeepers of truth or fact; you are the most base vandals of knowledge. In a cavalier sweep, you have wiped out of existence inarguable, well-documented, incontrovertible facts, and replaced them with your own reprehensible brand of pure fantasy, which you are knowingly, willfully foisting off on the world at large as “truth.” It is pure fiction, and you peddle it as fact. You are beneath contempt. You are beneath snake-oil salesmen. You are self-anointed, arrogant, disdainful High Priests of your own pet theories and delusions, which you shove down the throats of the rest of the world in unspeakable, haughty totalitarianism—claiming, of course, the “moral high ground.”

You believe in nonexistent “bugs” that the FBI proved conclusively never were installed in DNC headquarters. So you erase out of existence every documented FACT that proves that your delusional beliefs are as insane as belief in gryphons or unicorns, and shove your “religion” of Watergate down the throats of the rest of the world, as though it’s your Eucharist. Not ONE of you can document the existence, ever, of a single working bug planted in DNC headquarters. No, you can’t, any more than you can document the unicorn in your back yard or your stigmata.

You believe in nonexistent “logs” by Baldwin that never existed in the real world. You cannot document the existence, ever, of even one such log—just as not one of you can document the Virgin Mary or Tinkerbell coming and standing at the foot of your bed. But you push this swill off on the world, because it’s your religion, and you are the High Priests of sheer fiction.

You cannot document the existence, ever, of any “alarm” on the door of the Continental Room of the Watergate, because one never existed. It is sheer mythology—yet your ENTIRE BELIEF in the “official story” of Watergate hinges ENTIRELY on blind-faith belief that there WAS an alarm, that there HAD TO BE an alarm where none existed. Why? Because all of the disciples of your mad-dog religion, all of your so-called “reliable sources,” have TOLD you that there had to be an alarm there, otherwise the burglars would have broken in on Friday, 26 May 1972—even though the FBI PROVED that Alfred Baldwin was 300 miles away that night, so could not possibly have participated in the lying FICTION that he foisted off on Congress and the world. Oh, but you lap up the sewage spilled in gallons by Baldwin as though it were the blood of one of your saints, because without his lies—which have been proved conclusively as lies—your entire mythology that you reign as High Priests over goes up in smoke. And that would be a supreme waste of perfectly good smoke.

You sate yourselves like vampires on “reliable sources” like the L.A. Times, who published Baldwin’s original scandalous lies that he had driven back to D.C. on Thursday, 25 May. Have you ever bothered to check your so-called “reliable source”? Well, HAVE YOU? No, you haven’t, because you cling like blithering psychos to your Watergate religion—which is sheer fantasy—and you make sure that all heretics speaking actual facts are excommunicated, banished, silenced. If you had ever bothered to check your “reliable source,” the L.A. Times, you would have learned that the FBI proved conclusively that Baldwin’s car was STILL IN SERVICE AT BRANHAVEN CHRYSLER-PLYMOUTH, just outside of New Haven, Connecticut all day on 25 May. Did you bother to check? No, you didn’t, did you? Ashton Gray did. His book is the first and only book in the annals of all the millions of gallons of ink to find that in the FBI files and reveal the truth to the world. That’s exactly why Baldwin had to change his story in Congress, moving the date of his return to Washington to the next day, 26 May. The only problem is that the FBI also discovered that he was still in Connecticut on THAT day, too. And the ONE AND ONLY SOURCE IN THE HISTORY OF WATERGATE COVERAGE who ever found that out was Ashton Gray. And you call his book “weird”? You have the reprehensible gall to call Gray “unreliable” as a source?

Well, of course you do. You are the High Priests of Lies, Mythology, Fiction, and Fantasy Posing as “Fact.” Anything or anyone challenging your religious fanaticism with actual FACTS has to be pilloried, branded as a heretic, and burned at the stake—fed with the flames of your oh-so-righteous book burning.

You are worse than any vandals who ever trampled truth into the ground. You are worse than those who sacked and destroyed the Library of Alexandria. You poison the very groundwater of mankind’s knowledge with your revolting, autocratic, tyrannical priesthood of arrogance and disdain.

The saddest part, though, is that you believe in fairy tales, and don’t even know it. That kind of ignorance is its own reward.

Aftermath

And so, as it stands right now, Wikipedia’s “Watergate scandal” page is the biggest scandal of all: back to the same old stale and moldy government-packaged conspiracy theory that the world has accepted as the “Official Story” of Watergate. And it is a lie. It is a vicious lie. It was a never anything but a deadly hoax on the United States—and on the world—that overthrew a president, and launched the CIA’s longest-running, blackest secret program in its history.

We have no idea what happened to Celestia Jung. We urge him or her to contact us at info@chaletbooks.com because we always can use good, smart, dedicated researchers who have the integrity to follow the truth, and tell the truth, no matter where it goes.

As for Wikipedia, it should be shamed into the infamy it richly deserves. These words of Celestia Jung should be Wikipedia’s eulogy:

You are the most base vandals of knowledge. … You are beneath snake-oil salesmen. You are self-anointed, arrogant, disdainful High Priests of your own pet theories and delusions, which you shove down the throats of the rest of the world in unspeakable, haughty totalitarianism—claiming, of course, the “moral high ground.”
—Celestia Jung

When you want to know the truth about Watergate, when you want to know the cold, hard facts that your government and the Deep State—and Wikipedia—have kept you in the dark about for decades …

 

 

Watergate: The Hoax is available now
at Amazon, iBooks and 
Barnes & Noble.
Order it today!

Rewrite history with the truth!

 

read more

The CIA Psyops of Watergate and Beyond

Thursday, 7 December 2017 by

This is an excerpt from the book  Watergate: The Hoax, by Ashton Gray, now on sale at AmazoniBooks, Barnes & Noble, and other fine book retailers. This is Appendix III, “The CIA Psyops of Watergate and Beyond,” offered here in full as a public service because these same psyops are being used in the world today:

Although G. Gordon Liddy was not “officially” part of the CIA, he was operating under “special clearances” granted to him by CIA, and met at key times with high-level CIA officials. He also was supplied with disguises, false I.D., and equipment by the CIA, all crucial to many of the CIA psyops behind Watergate, the hoax.


Appendix III: The CIA Psyops of Watergate and Beyond

This is a warning: Watergate is a mine field of psychological operations techniques—PSYOPS. You’re free to ignore this warning. You can turn right to the first chapter and read this book without reading this appendix. The book was conceived and crafted as a path through that mine field, so you will come out the other end intact either way.

Your understanding and appreciation of what you’re walking through in reading it, though, will be greatly enhanced by investing a few minutes in reviewing some of the more deadly PSYOPS techniques that you’ll encounter—from a safe distance.

This appendix doesn’t pretend to be an exhaustive study of such black psychological techniques; it merely outlines major ones used in the packaging and selling of a CIA hoax of remarkable scope that is commonly known as “Watergate.”

“HISTORY” BY MANUFACTURED CONFESSION

Watergate is largely a false universe of purported history made up of some truth and a great many lies, most being in the form of “confessions.” It is an infinitely elastic universe, because its sum can’t possibly exist except in each individual perceiver’s mind. Once the volunteered “confessions” and accounts and testimony are closely compared, so many contradictions emerge that in order for much of Watergate to have happened at all, a universe with multiple time streams is required.

These contradictions aren’t the result of mere misperceptions by different eyewitnesses; these are cooked, manufactured fictions by people supposedly “confessing” their acts and the acts of others, or “confessing” a false purpose for certain acts. Their accounts of events, and of several staged phony “events,” contain elements of PSYOPS that are planted for no other purpose than to confuse, and, by confusing, to deflect close inspection and comparison that would reveal the lies.

This goes beyond what is commonly referred to in the intelligence trade as a “limited hangout”: voluntarily confessing to certain sins to deflect attention from others that are far more serious.

CONTRADICTIONS TO CREATE CONFUSION

A time-honored and favorite intelligence technique for creating confusion is to supply two separate and contradictory accounts of what purportedly is the same event. The mind locks. It cannot be resolved. No certain truth can be reached about the time span of the event, because both contradictory accounts cannot be true. The mind is forced to make a choice between two accounts that might both be false, or to leave it unresolved, yet still attempt to link that enduring mystery to other claimed or actual events that depend on it, or that take place around it. The landscape of Watergate is littered with such mental traps. They work hand-in-hand with the next op:

CONTRADICTION BY MULTIPLE SOURCES: THE COMMONALITIES

One frequently used technique to spread a tremendous amount of confusion is to supply seemingly plausible accounts of the “same” events through different sources, with the

varying accounts appearing at different times and in different places. A variation is to have several different accounts from one source, but told at different times. Each of the conflicting accounts has certain major commonly agreed-upon and sometimes true components. These are crucial to the fraud. The perceiver’s mind latches onto these common components they’ve heard about from “multiple sources,” and attempts to synthesize it all together into a cohesive whole, no matter how many details are at variance and odds with each other. The contradictory details most often are overlooked. That factor alone is the key to the success of the fraud.

That’s the way Watergate was packaged. To hear one participant’s testimony, it often makes some kind of “sense.” To read another perp’s book, it makes “sense.” The different accounts agree on certain points, but wildly diverge on others. The mind constructs a mental universe in which all these things are able to take place, and in which time not only is elastic, but even can be, and often must be, subconsciously subdivided into separate parallel, but unsynchronized, time streams.

THE MANIPULATION OF TIME

What the human imagination can do with time is infinite. When presented, as in Watergate, with multiple seemingly consistent but actually time-contradictory accounts and stories from multiple sources—each of which purports to be “fact”—the perceiver’s mind can, and will, subconsciously create parallel time streams. Consider a railroad track suddenly splitting off into four or six different tracks, each regulated with a different clock, those then merging again somehow at the commonalities, with common time, then splitting again, and so on.

This gets so absurd in Watergate that, when exposed, it can’t help but be funny, even with the realization that the CIA operation was an act of Treason during a time of war.

Only a careful and detailed comparison of all the accounts side-by-side, on one and only one time stream—the one governed by the motion of heavenly bodies and measured by clocks—reveals that no such set of events possibly could have taken place in objective reality.

A twist on this psyop is making the “time” in an incident or event as vague and indeterminate as possible, or giving an entirely false date. Among the dirtiest tricks is merely describing “events” with no date at all, which causes the “events” to float timelessly, and to shift around in the mind’s attempt to make them fit against other events. This is especially vicious when the “events” are simply fictions, or a mixture of fact and fiction. The lack of time information makes it extremely difficult to find any evidence to prove or disprove the anecdotal claims. CIA ops commonly leave out any definite date for a described event, or give a “date” that might be months or even a year or more off. Several instances have been found, by comparison to other sources, of the wrong year being given when the month and day are correct. Another psyop is to give a wrong sequence of events, especially when coupled with lack of any actual date.

These tricks with time create havoc in analysis.

FALSEHOODS AND OMISSIONS

Two major building blocks of false “histories” are: falsehoods that can’t be disproved (see Closed Doors And Clandestine Interaction below), and omissions of important facts. Through the use of an exacting timeline, the most blatant falsehoods often can be located. Once that’s done, more subtle falsehoods inevitably emerge, since they are necessary to the greater ones. By that stripping away of layers of falsity, omissions begin to emerge, the most obvious ones being the omission of whatever truth the lies were invented to conceal. This book was possible only by reference to a timeline database of over 11,000 entries.

Omissions are their own subject. Inevitably, where a false “reality” is being created to supplant or cover up the truth, many small omissions will be scattered throughout. They are difficult to perceive, because they are not there. This sounds obvious, but it is almost always missed. This is the irony of attempting to describe a “nothing.” People fail to look for what should be there—but isn’t. They merely accept what is supplied, even when what is supplied is false, and so create their own “explanations” to fill in the gaps. Life abhors a vacuum. It is difficult for life to perceive a vacuum, an absence, a “not there,” so life tends to fill the gap, often subconsciously. Some people find it next to impossible to look for omissions, so automatic and instant is their construction of “reasonable explanations” for entirely unreasonable circumstances, whether those be falsehoods or, commonly, omissions, or a combination.

Thus researchers and investigators and analysts and writers playing “connect the dots” with Watergate have been only connecting a considerable amount of fiction with very little verifiable fact, building mental “bridges” to span the gaps. Often they have attempted to do this over considerable yawning chasms, and hence the endless “theories” attempting to bridge the gaps and resolve the contradictions. Results and conclusions of such methods inevitably are false in varying degrees, and, however “interesting,” are ultimately unsatisfactory, since people by and large have a sense on some level of when they have been denied the truth.

THE PLURAL VS. SINGULAR MIND SPINNER

A subset of falsehoods and contradictions, this is a black ops technique used like repeated blows of a blunt instrument to the head all throughout Watergate and its “testimony.” It is used over and over and over to confound and confuse, but is so subtle as almost to escape notice entirely. The Senate Watergate Committee, for example, let floods of plural vs. singular contradictions go by.

The basic technique is to keep changing the singular/plural reference to items that play a role—sometimes even items that never had any existence at all.

It is used in the number of “bugs” supposedly planted in the Watergate, when there were none at all. It is used by E. Howard Hunt and the first lawyer for the Watergate burglars, Douglas Caddy, in the number of partners of Caddy’s law firm supposedly contacted by Caddy. It is used by Alfred Baldwin in referring to the number of “receiving units” in the Howard Johnson Motel rooms. It is used in reference to the number of Howard Johnson rooms occupied at any given time. It is used by Alfred Baldwin in the number of “logs” he purportedly hand-delivered to CREP headquarters (the real number is zero). And it is used by John Dean, L. Patrick Gray, Charles Colson, and E. Howard Hunt in their “Diem cables” fraud.

It is sheer hell on the mind. It keeps it in a constant state of uncertainty at a very low level of awareness, and it is almost never noticed by anybody unless this black PSYOPS technique is known about and pointed out as a well-trained black operation, used by operatives with malice aforethought to keep things in a state of constant confusion. That is its purpose.

THE PRINCIPLE OF DUPLICATES—“TWOSIES”

This is a deadly PSYOPS technique of planting near-duplicates as a method of creating enormous confusion. Certainly, life can and does produce coincidences of seeming similarity. But there is a knowing malefic use of this phenomenon that is done solely to confuse. It has been called a “burdensome fog” by John Gillespie.

One vicious example in Watergate is the purported “logs” of wiretaps. The stories of the co-conspirators allude to two complete (but entirely fictional) sets of these “logs”: one set supposedly made by Alfred Baldwin, another by G. Gordon Liddy that purportedly was created to “fix” Baldwin’s set—which never existed in the first place.

The phony “break-in” at the office of Daniel Ellsberg’s psychiatrist, Dr. Louis Fielding, and the later purported but entirely fictional “first break-in” at the Watergate were concocted to be extremely similar: both over holiday weekends, both using many of the same personnel, both having “walkie-talkie problems,” both failing to accomplish their purported (entirely false) “objectives,” and many more close similarities that one can count once the black PSYOPS techniques to generate such confusion is known.

On the subject of Dr. Fielding, another critical example is John Dean’s assistant, Fred Fielding, whose last-name counterpart, Dr. Fielding, is so important in the “Pentagon Papers” fraud that led to Watergate, itself merely the opening act in the greater CIA fraud. It is no accident that Dean was supplied with an “assistant” whose last name was Fielding. Both Fieldings are linked to the activities of E. Howard Hunt in crucial ways. In some of the testimony, particularly Dean’s, only the last name is used repeatedly. This is a trained technique used repeatedly for maximum destruction. It is tantamount to a stun grenade every place it is used. It scatters attention off in two different directions, on two different “tracks,” widely separated in time: in this case the “Dr. Fielding” CIA op of early September 1971, and the “Fred Fielding” involvement in the other CIA op, the fraud of Hunt’s “Diem cables,” which supposedly took place in 1972—but both “Fieldings” were injected into public view at about the same time in 1973 through the testimony of John Dean.

For now, suffice it to say that John Dean is the person whose role it was to make the “revelations” of both of these CIA operations, both involving “Fieldings” and E. Howard Hunt in some crucial way, and both designed to point away from CIA and at the White House. Dean did it when he had maximum world exposure: in the Senate Watergate hearings. Both of these “revelations” and “confessions” by Dean had world-shaking consequences.

CLOSED DOORS AND CLANDESTINE INTERACTION

A PSYOPS technique heavily relied upon in Watergate to create the conflicts and fictions described generally above is alleged private, secret talks and meetings and activities

between two, or a few, of the principal actors, with nothing more than their own assertions of what the subject and substance of such an interaction was. An almost inconceivable amount of what we know as Watergate is built on no more foundation, and it is no foundation at all. It often is pure fiction.

In most instances where we literally are forced to rely on the accounts of a small number of the co-conspirators interacting, one of more of the persons involved has known CIA background, connections, clearances, employment, or all four. The Watergate literature is so strewn with one-on-one encounters that the exceptions are easier to count than the instances.

All of the people involved in these clandestine interactions have been solidly documented as having told knowing, willful lies, even under oath, about these same events. Therefore, it is of an importance that cannot be overstated to recognize, in each instance where a private meeting or phone call purportedly takes place between two criminal co-conspirators, that the most that can be known with any relative certainty is that such an interchange took place.

Worse than that, there are important places in the record where close inspection and comparison leads to the only reasonable conclusion that even the claim of such two-party (or more) interaction is itself a completely manufactured fiction, never mind any claimed substance, purpose, or subject.

One startlingly elaborate example is the entirely manufactured and fictional Watergate “first break-in” and its two-week aftermath. The purported “break-in” involves seven people over three days of whole-cloth fiction. Layered on that is even more fiction consisting of a set of “events” that never happened at all, but is superimposed over the real events of two weeks in June 1972.

HIDDEN COMMUNICATIONS

The entire Intelligence Cult relies almost exclusively on hidden communications. This introduction has dealt with only a small facet of this, one used to manufacture fictions in secret for public performance and dissemination. A more deadly facet is that wherever such vermin are at work in the walls, the real-universe truth of what is being done, and what has been done, lies only hidden inside heavily fortified communications and filing systems exclusive to the Intelligence Cult.

For decades their carte noir wall of secrecy has been “national security.” The National Security Act of 1947 and its allied counterparts created the largest and most powerful organization of unprincipled criminals the world has ever known, and gave them an almost unlimited budget and almost unlimited control over world affairs. The act almost unquestionably was an act of social suicide for the civilizations of man, and the slow-acting but deadly poison still races today through the most vital organs of civilization. It has almost done its job.

If no antidote is administered soon, the world as we know it is likely to die by its own hand.

SUMMARY

As stated in the opening paragraph, this is merely an outline of some of the more deadly techniques used by CIA and its murderous sisters in its black ops against mankind. These techniques are not relegated to historical frauds like the Pentagon Papers and Watergate: the daily news you’re getting right this instant is filled with these same black ops.

This is the snake consuming itself, and it has no conscience or compunctions about consuming every last one of us in the process.

Ashton Gray

AUTHOR ADDENDUM: THE “NO-SEE-UM” PSYOP

In the published version of Watergate: The Hoax, the text refers repeatedly to another specific type of CIA psyop that I colloquially called, in the body of the book, a “no-see-um.” It technically fits under categories above, such as “Hidden Communications;” “Falsehoods and Omissions,” or “‘History by Manufactured Confession,” but it rightfully deserves its own detailed mention, and the editors have been kind enough to let me add it here.

As the name implies, the psyop refers to items of “evidence” that are discussed by perps as though they exist—or once existed—yet are never produced in the real world. There can be countless excuses or “reasons why” the item or items are not physically in evidence or available for inspection. Just a few examples from the book are, e.g.: an “envelope” full of “documents” supposedly “delivered” to a building guard—but that no one ever saw; an “alarm” on a door that never existed, but supposedly was “key” to a failed “break-in” attempt that never happened; electronic “bugs” supposedly planted in a office, but that never existed at all.

All of the CIA psyops are vicious destroyers of truth, and are vicious booby-traps for investigators and triers-of-fact trying to get to the truth. This one, the “No-See-Um,” may be the most deadly of all. The literature of “Watergate” is filled with such no-see-ums—utterly non-existent “things” that are discussed by supposedly rational and professional people just as those these invisible things ever existed. It may as well be a discussion of unicorns or gorgons.

That’s exactly why the unofficial motto of my book, repeated many times throughout, is: “Fiction doesn’t leave a paper trail.”

Because I point out so many “no-see-ums” in the body of the book, I didn’t think it necessary to add this specific category to this appendix at the time of publication. I now see that as an oversight—my own “no-see-um” perhaps—and I am grateful for this opportunity to correct it.

Ashton Gray

 

 

Watergate: The Hoax is available now
at Amazon, iBooks and 
Barnes & Noble.
Order it today!

Rewrite history with the truth!

 

read more

Ashton Gray’s Revolutionary New Book “Created Equal: The Greatest Lie”

Thursday, 30 November 2017 by

 

Chalet Books & Multimedia is proud to announce that Ashton Gray’s revolutionary new book, Created Equal: The Greatest Lie, is on sale now.  Here is an excerpt from Chapter 4, “The Man Behind the Curtain”:

4. The Man Behind the Curtain
In Whose Image

As a matter of sober fact, the truth outs: Locke was an atheist. Even his condescending “tolerance” for all non-Christian “gods” was itself a form of lip-service, because beneath all the preening piety-of- convenience, Locke was a materialist, and it is patently impossible to be a materialist and also believe that man has a soul or spiritual existence. This is the electrified fence dividing materialism and spirituality (note: I did not say “spiritualism,” about which more later), and it is not possible to straddle that fence. A 1913 definition by Constantin Gutberlet in Volume 10 of The Catholic Encyclopedia has it right:

Materialism is a philosophical system which regards matter as the only reality in the world, which undertakes to explain every event in the universe as resulting from the conditions and activity of matter, and which thus denies the existence of God and the soul.

Many “experts” have come along since that time and tried to slice, dice, divide, subdivide, and sub-subdivide that simple and accurate definition, positing a host of different “brands” of materialism, trying to soft-pedal its anti-God, anti-soul component, but this issue is truly “one side or the other.” Either the spiritual aspect of man’s existence is part of the equation of life, or it isn’t. Period. The perspicacious Will Durant, in his extraordinary work, The Story of Philosophy, demonstrated with impeccable logic how and why Locke was a materialist:

[Locke] announced, quietly, that all our knowledge comes from experience and through our senses—that “there is nothing in the mind except what was first in the senses.” The mind [according to Locke] is at birth a clean sheet, a tabula rasa; and sense-experience writes upon it in a thousand ways, until sensation begets memory and memory begets ideas. All of which seemed to lead to the startling conclusion that since only material things can effect our sense, we know nothing but matter, and must accept a materialistic philosophy.

Sir Isaac Newton—one of the two other men besides Locke who Thomas Jefferson considered to be “the three greatest men that have ever lived”—recognized that Locke was a materialist and an atheist, and actually said so, though it’s been buried and wished away by the disciples of Locke. One of Newton’s biographers, Frank E. Manuel, wastes far too much of his book, A Portrait of Isaac Newton, on pitifully amateurish attempts at long-distance time-travel Freudian analysis of Newton, but does document the fact that Newton accused Locke of being “a Hobbist, which meant a materialist and an atheist.” Manuel claims that Newton said it in the fit of a mental breakdown, but even though Newton apologized after the fact, it likely was among his most lucid and astute observations. (It should be noted that the quarrel between Locke and Newton took place in private correspondence, made public only many years after their deaths, and there is no reason to believe that Thomas Jefferson ever learned of it.)

Locke was the Grand High Wizard of materialism. Locke was an atheist in Christian disguise. Locke’s materialism and its disciples have turned the world and mankind to tar. And it’s tar from there on down. Now, in light of this knowledge, let’s briefly revisit that Lockean tar pit quoted at the beginning of this chapter, the one that Jefferson and friends got their feet stuck in, and peer through his pompous piety to what lies beneath:

The law of nature stands as an eternal rule to all men, legislators as well as others. The rules that they make for other men’s actions, must, as well as their own and other men’s actions, be conformable to the laws of nature, i.e. to the will of God … .

The state of nature has a law of nature to govern it, which obliges every one: and reason, which is that law, teaches all mankind … that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions: for men being all the workmanship of one omnipotent, and infinitely wise Maker … .

There, revealed, is an awe-inspiring example of the man’s worminess with words. Even the most devious lawyer would have to be impressed. Note that he does not directly say the “law of God,” nor does he anywhere in the piece unequivocally declare that the Judeo-Christian god Yahweh was the “God” with the “will,” or was the “omnipotent, and infinitely wise Maker” behind creating this alleged “law of nature.” His ambiguity has you already knee-deep in the tar—and you’re there whether you are Christian or Wiccan or with the Cult of Kek. Then Locke springs the ultimate trap: he claims that man’s ability to reason—the ability to think and draw conclusions—is the sum and totality of this alleged “law of nature”—which he claims is “the will of God.” Some God.

But wait: in his notes quoted earlier, he declared that “truths wrought in the mind extraordinarily by influence coming immediately from God himself” were “ravings,” and “dangerous madness.” So how, then, could Locke possibly know that “reason” was the “will of God” without it being a “truth wrought” in his own mind “by influence coming immediately from God himself ”? But that would mean that Locke was—well, mad.

And now you’re not only hip-deep in the tar, you’re riding the Lockean Merry-Go-Round to Nowhere in the tar. And it’s sinking. Fast. Just one reason it’s such a deadly trap is that it forces every person reading such madness to guess or conclude subjectively—using his own “reason”—what the “law of nature” or “law of God” is, and what “God” ordained it.

But wait: If we go back to Locke’s “Reasonableness of Christianity,” that would have to mean, inescapably, that Adam had been given this ability to reason by his “infinitely wise Maker.” And when Adam used his reason, he reasoned that the best thing he could do was take a bite from the forbidden fruit. And that condemned us all.

But wait: According to Locke, that “reason” that Adam used is the “law of nature,” which also is “the will of God.” Which can only mean, inescapably, that God intentionally rigged Adam’s ability to reason so he would make the most deadly decision possible. And that, according to Locke, is an “eternal rule” to guide “all men.”

And as you bubble down into the black, sticky, no-escape mire of Lockean lunacy, going round and round and round, your last thought is, “Oh: all men are created equal.” And you drown in the tar of materialism. John Locke was not a Christian. He pretended to be, and he used the language of “God” and the Bible—writing primarily for Christians of every description in his era—the way a carnival barker uses “We have a winna’!”

Be among the first to buy and own this landmark work! Order now for only $4.99 at Amazon.com.

Available as Kindle and  trade paperback; coming soon in other formats to other vendors.

It makes the ultimate Christmas “red pill” for your friends and family!

 

And also order Ashton Gray’s groundbreaking exposé of CIA crimes:

 

 

Watergate: The Hoax is available now
at Amazon, iBooks and 
Barnes & Noble.
Order it today!

Rewrite history with the truth!

 

read more

There Were No “Bugs” in DNC Headquarters at the Watergate

Friday, 27 October 2017 by

This is an excerpt from the book  Watergate: The Hoax, by Ashton Gray, now on sale at AmazoniBooks, Barnes & Noble, and other fine book retailers. This is taken from the last section of Chapter 3, “Invisible Bugs”:

“Watergate” was a hoax perpetrated by operatives of the CIA, and there never were any bugs planted at all. Far left: CIA veteran E. Howard Hunt. Middle photos, top left to bottom right: CIA veteran James McCord; CIA veteran Bernard Barker; FBI veteran working for CIA, taking orders from James McCord, Alfred Baldwin; CIA veteran Eugenio Martinez; CIA veteran Frank Sturgis; CIA veteran Virgilio Gonzales. Far right: G. Gordon Liddy, on “special clearances” from CIA.

Everything that can be counted does not necessarily count;
everything that counts cannot necessarily be counted.
—Albert Einstein

THERE WERE NO BUGS IN DNC HEADQUARTERS IN THE WATERGATE

The infamous bugs never existed, period. The entire grotesque, nightmarish, Byzantine world of Watergate was built on the existence of these bugs, the way the world we live on—according to some creation myths—is supposed to be supported on the back of a mud turtle. The difference is that the mud turtle has more substance; the Watergate bugs are pure fiction. Watergate stands on thin air.

This isn’t some wild allegation. In fact, it is the only independently verified evidence in the entire width and breadth of everything ever published about Watergate, including the findings of the various Congressional committees that bird-dogged the matter, and it was independently verified not once, but twice.

It first was independently verified by Earl Connor, Chief of Security of the Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company, along with his assistant, who had installed the telephone system in DNC Headquarters.

Connor and his assistant had been called in after five men were arrested at 2:30 a.m. on Saturday morning, 17 June 1972, inside those DNC offices in the Watergate: James McCord, Bernard Barker, Eugenio Martinez, Virgilio Gonzales, and Frank Sturgis. That arrest would become known—fraudulently—as the “second break-in.”

That brings us slam up against perhaps the most vicious “twosie” in Watergate: not one, but two purported break-ins at DNC headquarters—except one of them actually happened and the other is fiction. That is what makes it such a vicious, deadly pit of confusion. To climb out of that pit, it helps to run the newsreel backward, as a reverse- action timeline:

Saturday, 17 June 1972, 2:30 a.m.
James McCord, Bernard Barker, Eugenio Martinez, Virgilio Gonzales, and Frank Sturgis are arrested inside DNC headquarters, having broken in. James McCord has carefully set things up so the break-in will be “discovered” while they are inside. He is carrying pieces of “bugging” equipment—which in fact are only props for the hoax. This is called the “second break-in,” which is a lie, because it is the only break-in that actually happened. [See “Part VII: The Break-In That Was and Aftermath.” —Ed.] The men arrested later would “confess” that the reason they had broken in at the Watergate was to “fix” a problem with bugs they claimed they had planted several weeks earlier, during a “first break-in” (which never happened) over Memorial Day weekend, on 28 May 1972.

Sunday, 28 May 1972, just before or just after midnight
Date of the mythological “first break-in” of DNC headquarters in the Watergate—which never happened. This supposedly is when James McCord planted two telephone bugs inside DNC headquarters that Alfred Baldwin claims he was “monitoring”—which, as already proven, was impossible—from shortly after this date until the purported “second break-in.” According to later “confessions” by the hoaxers, it took them three different tries on three different nights of Memorial Day weekend, with two “failed” attempts (yet another “twosie”) on the nights of Friday, 26 May and Saturday, 27 May 1972. [See “Part II: The Break-In That Never Was.” —Ed.]

Back to real time: On the day of the arrests, Saturday, 17 June 1972, Earl Connor from Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company and his assistant came in and, according to the FBI, began “a security survey of the telephone and communications equipment” in the DNC offices.” Their survey continued into the next day, Sunday, 18 June 1972. The purpose of the security survey, the FBI report said, was “to physically examine all telephone installations and telephone equipment on the sixth floor space at DNCH [Democratic National Committee Headquarters] for wiretap devices.”

They found none.

There were no bugs.

Cheesy electronic “bugging” devices like this one pictured were carefully planted by the CIA perpetrators as “evidence” to incriminate the Nixon administration, but were nothing more than theatrical props. No actual bugs were planted in DNC headquarters.

Connor and his assistant had been called in because one of the Watergate suspects, “former” CIA agent James McCord, had in his possession when he was arrested several kinds of electronic bugging items. Nobody knew at the time why he had the equipment with him, and McCord wasn’t talking to the police. Police and FBI couldn’t even figure out whether the men were there to plant bugs or remove them. The correct answer was “neither.” The electronic equipment that McCord was carrying was nothing but a set of theatrical props, but Connor and his assistant were put on the job of finding out if any bugs had been planted by the burglars.

Connor reported to the FBI that “all available telephones were checked.” There were no bugs. His survey of the equipment included “taking the telephones physically apart for visual inspection for foreign items and none were found.”

There were no bugs.

The second time it was independently verified was 11 days later, with another two-day security survey of DNC Headquarters, this time by “technically trained agents of the FBI Laboratory.” Their survey began on Thursday, 29 June and ended on Friday, 30 June 1972.

The results were negative. No “electronic surveillance equipment” was found. There were no bugs in DNC headquarters. Period.

This bears repeating. It almost couldn’t be repeated too often: two separate security surveys conducted at relevant times by technically trained personnel, first from C & P Telephone Company, then from the FBI Laboratory, found that there were no electronic bugs on any of the phones or anywhere else in DNC headquarters at the Watergate.

To put this another way, the only independently verified evidence that exists in all of Watergate is of something that isn’t, and never was at any relevant time: bugs, wiretaps, phone taps, electronic listening devices inside DNC Headquarters. There were none. They are the invisible bugs.

Inevitably, those invisible bugs produced the only thing they could produce: Alfred Baldwin’s invisible wiretap logs.

Chapter 4, “Alfred Baldwin’s Invisible Wiretap Logs,” is more incontrovertible proof that Watergate was nothing but a fraud, a hoax, perpetrated on the American people, on a sitting President of the United States, on Congress,  and on the world by the CIA, using phony lying “confessions” by mercenary CIA veterans to cover up a CIA operation than was far dirtier than anything the world ever was allowed to find out about. Until now. That’s why reviewers are calling Ashton Gray’s Watergate: The Hoax “a forensic tour de force,” “magisterial,” “brilliant,” “stunning,” and “monumental.” Buy it today. Read it today. Tell the world.

 

 

Watergate: The Hoax is available now
at Amazon, iBooks and 
Barnes & Noble.
Order it today!

Rewrite history with the truth!

 

read more

Ashton Gray’s “Created Equal: The Greatest Lie” Now Available

Saturday, 7 October 2017 by

UPDATE: Chalet Books & Multimedia is proud to announce that Ashton Gray’s revolutionary new book, Created Equal: The Greatest Lie, is on sale now at Amazon.com. It was released on Friday, 1 December 2017. Here is an excerpt from the book, Chapter 1, “The Equality Myth”:

1. The Equality Myth
A Fatuous Fiction

Whether your concept of the origin of the universe is a cosmic explosion, the spoken command of an omnipotent father figure, the dream of a many-armed god, or the promiscuous coagulation of primordial mist, you will search its width and breadth in vain for two things equal to each other.

The heavens have yet to reveal two equal stars. Every planet in the cosmos is different from every other planet. No rock or boulder ever is equal to any other. No two grains of sand match exactly.

Go into a field or lawn and pick a blade of grass; you hold in your hands a unique creation that has no equal anywhere in the world, or in the universe. The very fact that it is in your hands sets it apart, but even before you picked it, it occupied its own space. It pointed in its own direction. It had its own length, veining, coloring, texture, thickness, weight, roots, and arrangement of unique cells that formed the whole, every detail setting it significantly, dramatically apart from every other blade of grass that exists, that ever has existed, or that ever will exist.

From the cosmic to the microscopic, from the macrocosm to the microcosm, from stellar magnitudes down to molecular level and beyond, there is one message that this universe—however it got here— seems relentlessly intent on dictating, displaying, proving, over and over, infinitely: “There shall be no thing equal to any other.”

Yet one of the most universal, pervasive, and inescapable beliefs in the world today is that “all men are created equal.”

It is in the schools.
It is in the marketplace.
It is in the workplace.
It is in the neighborhood.
It is in the statehouse.
It belongs in the madhouse.
It is a meaningless myth.
It is the greatest lie.

Be among the first to buy and own this landmark work! Order now for only $4.99 at Amazon.com.

 

Also order Ashton Gray’s historic exposé of the Deep State:

 

 

Watergate: The Hoax is available now
at Amazon, iBooks and 
Barnes & Noble.
Order it today!

Rewrite history with the truth!

 

read more

The First Remote Viewing Experiment—Documented

Saturday, 20 May 2017 by

Treasures from the University of West Georgia’s collection of the
private papers of Ingo Swann

The research for Ashton Gray’s book Watergate: The Hoax involved more than a dozen researchers whose contributions over the course of nearly two decades accumulated into a massive database—searchable, and sortable by date—of over 13,000 entries.

At the outset of the research, no one could have guessed that the investigations would lead them to the Central Intelligence Agency’s “remote viewing” program, which began the same year as Watergate: 1972. But it did. And that track of research ultimately led a seasoned researcher off on a trip to the University of West Georgia to review the permanent collection of private papers of Scientology OT VII Ingo Swann, accompanied on the quest by a volunteer research associate: a teacher named Meredith Wilson.

In the university’s research room, the curator of the collection brought them box after box of original, one-of-a-kind documents, a treasure trove of gems of information found nowhere else in the world. Many of those documents are cited in Watergate: The Hoax, supplying crucial pieces that had been missing from all previous literature on Watergate and the CIA’s remove viewing program.

One of those invaluable gems was a startling find: documentation of the very first, ever, experiment in “remote viewing,” conducted with Ingo Swann by Dr. Janet Mitchell at the American Society of Psychical Research (ASPR) in New York City. In fact, it is the experiment that caused Ingo Swann to coin the term “remote viewing.” Swann had said in several autobiographical works that he had coined the term on December 8, 1971, after this experiment of the same date, and other authors have discussed the fact, but there has been no known contemporaneous record of the event—until now.

The University of West Georgia did not allow photocopying of the papers, but kindly gave permission to the researchers to take photos of important papers with their phones, and to make limited use of such images for historical and educational purposes. Given the historic importance of these two pages of documents, we feel an obligation—and an honor—to present them here for the public good.

A note about the two pages below: Although the experiment took place on December 8, 1971, Swann’s monitor who was conducting the experiment, Dr. Janet Mitchell, wrote up her notes about it several days later, after checking several newspapers to verify Swann’s results, and after another experiment she mentions that took place on December 11, 1971. Her write-up is on different paper that was glued onto two different sheets of paper with page numbers 71 and 72—part of a historical account that had been compiled, found among the collection. That’s why her report has a different shade in the black-and-white images. Here are the photos taken of the documents at the university:

 

Here is a text transcript of those two pages:

[page number] 71

FIRST INFORMAL LONG-DISTANCE REMOTE VIEWING EXPERIMENT AT THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR PSYCHICAL RESEARCH.
J. Mitchell and I. Swann, 8 December 1971.

The following report is informal, and should be considered an example of a spontaneous task that took place while waiting instrumentation alignments for formal experiments that were in progress at the ASPR.

In view of subsequent controlled long-distance remote viewing experiments at Stanford Research Institute, however, this first impromptu feat is provided for the record.

[Janet Mitchell report glued to document pages]:

Ingo Swann – 12/8/71

At the 13th minute on this record Ingo reported over the intercom that he was going to Arizona. He goes out there often.

He then said it was cloudy and cold over Tucson. Using this infor mation as a sort of target, I checked out the weather in Tucsdn for that day.

N.Y. Times, Dec. 9, 1971, p. 93 – Weather is reported for a 24-hour period from 7PM on Dec. 7th to 7PM on Dec. 8th. The high for Tucson was 3 8 degrees. The low was 30 degrees. Precipitation at .68. General condition was cloudy.

N.Y. Times, Dec. 8, 1971, p. 110 – Report from 7PM Dec. 6th to 7PM Dec. 7th for Tucson. High – 54, Low – 42, Precipitation – .02, General Condition – Cloudy.

[page number] 72

As you can see, it was definitely cold and cloudy over Tucson on Dec. 8, 1971. So, Ingo is getting information about the target box in the room correct and weather conditions as far as 3,000 miles away correct.

Minutes 2 & 3 when Ingo was looking in the box show less beta and more theta: 38-10-13, 36-07-19

Minutes 13 & 14 when Ingo was in Arizona more beta and less theta: 47-09-06, 49-06-07

This finding is not consistent on other records – see 12/11, Minute 3 and 11/24 for both box and Arizona readings.

As one more note: A host of people who are hopelessly ignorant of the facts, and apparently want to remain that way, have stridently claimed all over the Internet that Ingo Swann’s abilities had nothing to do with Scientology. Those people will absolutely hate this image below, and will try to wish it out of existence, but it is from a carbon copy Swann saved of a letter he wrote to L. Ron Hubbard on July 6, 1972—one month to the day after Swann’s famous incident when he affected the sealed magnetometer in the Varian Hall of Physics at Stanford University. Swann addressed the letter to Hubbard “Via A. Maren,” who was Artie Maren, then in Scientology’s Guardian’s Office in Los Angeles. In the letter, Swann is discussing his successes in the fields of parapsychology, when he says this:

The text of the relevant highlighted portion:

Nothing I can do, which includes the ability of precise communication through and up to various OT phenomena, could have been possible in the controlled state without your genius and the training and auditing which I have undertaken in Scientology.

—Ingo Swann to L. Ron Hubbard, July 6, 1972

At the time of this writing, no other investigative report or book has cited, quoted, or made use of this extraordinary collection of documents—except for Ashton Gray’s Watergate: The Hoax. Chalet Books is proud to be associated with this groundbreaking work, and honored to be able to present these historic facts to the world.

CIA Eagle Outline Art-4
Ashton Gray’s Watergate: The Hoax shreds the lies and myths about Watergate. It is finally rewriting the history books with the truth. Don’t be left out of this intellectual and historical revolution that rips the veil off of some of the dirtiest secrets in the history of the United States, and exposes the biggest crime against man’s storehouse of knowledge in the history of the world. Buy it, read it, give it to your friends and loved ones. “And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.”

 

 

Watergate: The Hoax is available now
at Amazon, iBooks and 
Barnes & Noble.
Order it today!

Rewrite history with the truth!

 

read more

“Watergate: The Hoax”—CENSORED by the Education Forum and Wikipedia!

Saturday, 8 October 2016 by

In an absolutely stunning turn of events, we have learned that a major worldwide forum—known, ironically, as the Education Forum—has stealthily censored, by deleting, an excerpt from our landmark book by Ashton Gray, Watergate: The Hoax.

On 14 January 2016, author Ashton Gray had posted an excerpt from Chapter 1, “Invisible Contracts,” in the Watergate section of the forum, which is in the category called Controversial Issues in History. A little over two weeks later, on 31 January, Mr. Gray got a private message from one of the administrators of the forum, James R. Gordon, suspending Mr. Gray’s posting privileges, claiming that it was “likely legal action may well be taken against” Mr. Gray “by a fellow member”—but with absolutely no reason for any such claim of “legal action,” and no identification of the mysterious “fellow member” of the Education Forum threatening any such legal action.

Less than an hour later, Ashton Gray responded:

James,

Thank you for your message.

The fact that someone has claimed to you that they have a “likely” cause of legal action against me, with no specifics, and that you have communicated that to unspecified “administrators,” and that you have taken action to my detriment as a result, unfortunately makes you a party to whatever arises from this defamation.

I therefore have to respectfully request that you supply to me at your earliest possible opportunity:

1. The name and contact information of the person claiming to have a cause of action.

2. All written communication related to this defamation.

3. The names and contact information of each other person to whom this defamation has been spread.

4. An address for you for possible service of process.

Kind regards,

Ashton

Within only a few hours, James Gordon wrote back to back-peddle, saying that the administrators may have placed Mr. Gray “at a disadvantage,” and that Gordon was going to “take counsel on this whole issue.” Meanwhile, he restored Mr. Gray’s posting privileges—but he refused to tell Mr. Gray the name of the person who had threatened legal action in the first place. All he would say was that the complaint had come to him “in a PM [private message],” adding this curious note: “it should not take you long to work out who it is.” Not long indeed…

Douglas “Ragtop” Caddy and the Mysterious Disappearing Excerpt

Recently one of our researchers went to find the excerpt from Watergate: The Hoax that Mr. Gray had posted to the Education Forum on 14 January 2016 that is about a man named Douglas Caddy. Caddy was the attorney who “gratuitously” (according to the FBI) showed up to represent the Watergate burglars when they were arrested on 17 June 1972. Naturally, Caddy looms large in the book, and the excerpt about him from Chapter 1 contains crucial information, much of it never collected in one place. But when our research went to the Eduction Forum to find it…

The excerpt had disappeared! Someone at the Education Forum CENSORED the excerpt by quietly DELETING IT, and never told Mr. Gray, or anybody at Chalet Books!

This isn’t the act of “educators;” this is the act of dictators and totalitarians! Who are they protecting? What are they trying to hide? You can decide for yourself, because here is the exact excerpt from Watergate: The Hoax that THE EDUCATION FORUM CENSORED:

CIA Eagle Outline Art-4

Douglas “Ragtop” Caddy must have been stone blind to invisible contracts, even though they were flapping all around him, and he seems to have had more than a few of his own. On the morning of the arrests of five men in the Watergate—James McCord, Bernard Barker, Frank Sturgis, Virgilio Gonzales, and Eugenio Martinez—Caddy popped up at the jail like a Jack-in-the-box saying he was there to represent them, and nobody could figure out how he got there or why. The FBI files on Watergate contain no fewer than 10 instances of the following statement or some variation of it, always containing the word “gratuitously”:

Michael Douglas Caddy, also known as Douglas Caddy, is an Attorney at Law having offices at 1250 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Washington, D. C., and is associated with the law firm Gall, Lane, Powell, and Kilcullen. Caddy gratuitously appeared at the Metropolitan Police Department where subjects were taken after being arrested and claimed to represent them. Prior to Caddy’s arrival, none of the subjects made any phone calls which might have precipitated his appearance.[25]

Perhaps the initial representation of the five Watergate suspects constitutes one of the most invisible contracts of all. Although the FBI reported that Caddy “claimed to represent them” and the Washington Post described Caddy as “one of the attorneys for the five men,” Caddy had no experience at all in criminal cases. He had brought a criminal lawyer named Joseph Rafferty along with him to the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department that day. Rafferty later told the FBI that Caddy had “asked him to defend the five subjects involved in a break-in at the Watergate.” To further cloud the issue, Caddy later was declared in contempt of court for refusing to answer a set of questions before the Watergate grand jury, but the reason he gave was an attorney-client relationship with E. Howard Hunt—not with the original Watergate Five. [More about Caddy, Rafferty, and the events surrounding the arrests is covered in Part IV, “The Break-in That Was.” —Ed.]

Before Caddy gained notoriety as the first attorney associated in the media with the Watergate suspects, he had spent close to four years in the offices of Governor Nelson Rockefeller in New York, from 1962 to 1966. This is the very same Nelson Rockefeller who would become Vice President of the United States under Gerald Ford just a few years later, when Nixon was cut off at the knees by Watergate. It is the same Nelson Rockefeller who later would chair a committee specifically empanelled to investigate “CIA Activities Within the United States,” but who somehow would manage to miss the three Scientology OTs that the CIA had under contract in the United States—and under Rockefeller’s nose—to develop the parapsychology program later called “remote viewing.” Yes, that Nelson Rockefeller.

Caddy technically worked for Nelson Rockefeller’s lieutenant governor, Malcolm Wilson, but they all were in the same townhouse, which was owned by Nelson Rockefeller and housed his office as governor. In 1966 Caddy went from the Rockefeller clan to the General Foods Corporation, and in late 1969 that firm sent him to work in the Washington, D.C., offices of the Robert R. Mullen Company. That company name may sound familiar.

Caddy served at Mullen as public relations liaison for General Foods, and though he worked at the Mullen offices, his contract with Mullen was invisible: “At no time was I ever on the payroll of the Mullen Company. I was exclusively employed by General Foods.”[26]

Caddy has since “concluded that General Foods knew the Mullen Company was a CIA front and that General Foods cooperated with the cover operation.”[27] He has gone so far as to say: “The Mullen Company had been incorporated by the CIA in 1959 and served as a front for the intelligence agency. The Mullen Company offices around the world were in fact operations of the CIA and General Foods was aware of this and a participant in the overall intelligence scheme.”[28] Yet Caddy claims that he just had no idea that he was completely surrounded by CIA spooks when he was at Mullen, or that Robert Mullen’s company was a CIA front.

It’s certainly rational to wonder why CIA-savvy General Foods, working with CIA-front company Mullen in furtherance of CIA aims and operations, would send a CIA-ignorant innocent into the D.C. lion’s den. But “Ragtop” Caddy may be the most CIA-involved non-CIA rube ever, at least to hear him tell it—a latter-day Pantagleize who stumbles and bumbles, all unawares, from one CIA connection to another, up to his unplucked eyebrows in dirty doings, but utterly innocent and naive, being used and abused by these unscrupulous covert intelligence operatives that he just can’t seem to get away from.

For instance, in the “late 1950s and early 1960s,” Caddy had “worked closely with” William F. Buckley, Jr.—that’s “former” CIA agent William F. Buckley, Jr., who had been an agent under the direction of E. Howard Hunt in Mexico City during the 1950s. What a cozy little group. But Caddy insists that he “did not know” about Buckley having been a CIA agent until Hunt told him in 1970 at Mullen. Of course, that would mean that Hunt had no problem offhandedly giving up the identity of CIA agents to a casual non-CIA business acquaintance. Naturally.

Caddy’s connection with Buckley purportedly came about because Caddy had been a founding member of the Young Americans for Freedom (YAF), an organization that Buckley championed. One indication of Caddy’s character—a phrase that may ultimately gain infamy as an oxymoron—is embodied in a smash-and-grab related to YAF that author John A. Andrew III has labeled “The Douglas Caddy Affair.”

In early July [1962], Caddy, [William] Cotter, and another individual (“a big guy”) barged into the YAF offices, overpowered the two YAFers on duty, and made off with the general membership list, the general ledger, and a list of four or five thousand financial contributors to YAF. Caddy apparently photocopied them at his Chamber of Commerce offices, returning the originals to YAF a few days later. Robert Bauman threatened Caddy with a felony prosecution, and Caddy turned over the copies to YAF. He was then fired by the Chamber of Commerce.[29]

It must have been either a matter of Providence or a matter of the Central Intelligence Agency that Caddy got slid over from the Rockefeller offices first to CIA handmaiden General Foods, then got injected directly into the CIA front Mullen Company just months before Hunt got placed there. However either of them got there, Caddy claims that Robert Mullen called both Caddy and Hunt into his office one day after Hunt had been there “a few months.” According to Caddy’s account:

I first met Howard Hunt in 1970 . . . The occasion of our first meeting was Howard’s coming on board as an employee at the Robert Mullen & Company upon his “retiring” from the CIA.

. . . A few months [after] our initial meeting, Robert Mullen called us into his office and surprised us by saying that he desired to retire and wanted to sell the Mullen Company. He then asked if we would be interested in purchasing it.

. . . Then one day Mullen announced out of the blue that he had decided to sell his company to Robert Bennett, a Mormon who was the son of the senior U.S. Senator from Utah. What I came to learn years later was that Mullen, Bennett and Hunt knew something that had been kept from me, namely that the Mullen Company had been incorporated by the CIA in 1959 and served as a front for the intelligence agency. [30]

That all sounds quite reasonable—except that in his 1974 autobiography, E. Howard Hunt claims that Robert Mullen talked to him about buying the company in an interview before Hunt left the CIA and took the job at Mullen. Although Caddy is mentioned by Hunt, there is nothing about Caddy having been present at Hunt’s second job interview with Mullen— and of course Caddy wouldn’t have been present:

During a second meeting Mullen told me that he was getting on in years, the company was comfortably established and he was casting about for younger successors to take over the management and direction of the firm. One of Mullen’s accounts was the General Foods Corporation, whose Washington representative, Douglas Caddy, worked out of the Mullen offices. According to Mullen, with Caddy, myself and an as-yet-unselected individual [emphasis added], Mullen would be able to retire, leaving the business in the hands of this successor triumvirate.[31]

One problem with that is that Hunt had already told a different story under oath to the ill-fated Nedzi Committee, testifying on Thursday, 28 June 1973:

During one of my earlier interviews with Mr. Mullen prior to my retirement from CIA, and again [sic] prior to my being hired by the Mullen Co., Mr. Mullen indicated to me he had been in the public relations business for a number of years, that he was getting on in years himself, that he looked forward to retirement, and he had developed a plan under which he wanted to take in younger blood into the firm. He had in mind three candidates who would form a triumvirate, take over the firm and operate it, and he would be, in effect, a retired emeritus director of the company; he indicated to me a young man there in the office, an attorney from the General Foods Co., Douglas Caddy, would be one; I would be the second; and Bob Bennett, son of the Senator, would be the third [emphasis added].[32]

Hunt’s use of the phrase “an as-yet-unselected individual” in his autobiography is downright weird when compared to his prior sworn testimony, and to the story told to the FBI by the man that Mullen ultimately sold the company to: CIA-chummy Robert “Bob” Bennett. Bennett told the FBI agents investigating Watergate that Mullen had offered him the opportunity to buy the company long before either Caddy or Hunt had arrived on the scene. He said the offer was made about “four years” before Watergate, which would have made it sometime around June 1968. Bennett had turned the opportunity down at the time, but apparently had held onto an exclusive option from Mullen—another invisible contract—to buy the company. Then in 1970, after Hunt had been hired, Mullen came back to Bennett about buying the firm, according to the FBI report about its interview with Bennett:

Mr. Bennett stated that Mr. Mullen arranged a luncheon meeting approximately [June 1970] to discuss the details of the purchase of the company. Mr. Bennett said that he was surprised when Douglas Caddy and Everette Howard Hunt appeared at the meeting with Mr. Mullen.

Mr. Mullen explained that Douglas Caddy and Everette Howard Hunt had expressed a desire to purchase a portion of the stock of the Robert R. Mullen and Company and he, Mr. Mullen, felt that they should all get together and discuss this issue. Mr. Bennett said that he did discuss this matter with Douglas Caddy and Everette Howard Hunt, but no conclusion was reached at this luncheon meeting.

. . . Bennett stated that subsequent to this meeting with Mullen, Caddy and Hunt, he exercised his original option [emphasis added] for the exclusive purchase of the Robert R. Mullen and Company and completed the negotiations for the purchase of the company with Mr. Mullen.[33]

No matter how anybody tells it, it’s impossible for anyone with a measurable IQ to conceive of Robert Mullen proposing any sale of his CIA front company to Caddy unless Caddy were fully in on the CIA involvement—as were Mullen, Bennett and Hunt—and unless the CIA had fully approved of such a transaction before the first word was whispered about it. (When Caddy was asked directly about this obvious point in a public forum in 2005, he did what Caddy does so well: he ignored the question.) Even Sarah Silverman isn’t stupid enough to fall for that one. (Okay; maybe she is.)

As Bennett continued his interview with the FBI, he gave a few more insights into Caddy’s “character”:

Mr. Bennett stated that during this period of negotiations for the purchase of the company, both the Robert R. Mullen Company and the General Foods Corporation found Douglas Caddy’s performance to be unacceptable and Mr. Caddy was released from his position [emphasis added] by the General Foods Corporation. Bennett stated that through a contact, Mr. Mullen arranged for Douglas Caddy to obtain a position as an attorney with the law firm Gall, Lane, Powell and Kilcullen, Suite 707, 1250 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., WDC. Mr. Bennett noted that Douglas Caddy had left the Robert R. Mullen and Company before he [Bennett] assumed the duties as President of the company.[34]

Caddy didn’t see it that way at all:

After meeting Bennett and finding him to be an extremely strange man who exuded duplicity I chose to leave [emphasis added] General Foods and went to work as an attorney with the Washington law firm of Gall, Lane, Powell and Kilcullen.[35]

And Hunt claimed in his autobiography that “Douglas Caddy resigned [emphasis added] from General Foods and left the Mullen & Company office in favor of practicing law.”

It’s a grand waste of time to attempt to figure out which one was lying, and there’s one simple explanation for all of these contradictions: It’s nothing but a scripted “story” that they all kept trying to tell, but they all were lying. That’s what intelligence operatives do daily, professionally: They lie. Most likely, there never was any other plan than for Caddy and Hunt to link up with each other, and with the CIA operatives Mullen and Bennett. One primary reason is that black intelligence operations in Europe were going to be crucial to Watergate, the hoax [see Part III, The Beginning], and Caddy was crucial to the U.S. side of the fraud, but he needed to be actively practicing law to play his role.

Once “Ragtop” Caddy had motored on down to Gall, Lane, Powell and Kilcullen, he curiously became personal attorney for CIA veteran E. Howard Hunt in 1971, a relationship he would be in right up through his contempt of court conviction. Later chapters will demonstrate that Caddy or Baldwin or Hunt—or all of them—lied about the way Caddy was contacted on the morning of the arrests at the Watergate, and how Bernard Barker factored into the convoluted conflicting stories.

Caddy has stipulated to having met with Hunt and CIA goon-squad leader Bernard Barker in mid June 1971 at the Army-Navy Club in D.C., at a crucial time leading up to Watergate—but Caddy later told the FBI that they’d only had “a very amiable conversation concerning their mutual views on politics.” Of course they did. Yet when Caddy rewrote himself on 6 February 2006, he told it a different way:

My meeting came about by Howard Hunt inviting me to join him for lunch at the Navy Club [sic] in Washington, D.C. When I arrived there, Hunt and Barker were already seated and Hunt made the introductions. I do not recall exactly what we discussed but it most likely was Barker’s role under Hunt in the ill-fated invasion of Cuba that took place under President Kennedy, who later came to believe that he had been misled and misadvised by the CIA on the matter.[36]

From “I do not recall,” Caddy’s memory came back to him with stunning clarity only a little more than four months after that memory failure episode, because on 15 June 2006 he wrote:

When I arrived Hunt was already there with his guest, Bernard Barker. Hunt made the introductions. The luncheon conversation was almost entirely consumed with Hunt and Barker recounting their involvement in the ill-fated Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba.[37]

First, the meeting was chit-chat about shared views on politics. Then it was “I do not recall exactly what we discussed.” Then it was “almost consumed” with stories of the Bay of Pigs fiasco—when both Hunt and Barker had been working for the CIA. That is extraordinary if Caddy’s accounting of when the meeting took place is true, because nearly every conversation in D.C. around that time was “consumed” with the topic of The New York Times having just published the Pentagon Papers on 13 June 1971—leaked to them by one Daniel Ellsberg. And only a few months later, E. Howard Hunt and Bernard Barker would be involved in the infamous “break-in” at the offices in Beverly Hills, California, of Dr. Lewis J. Fielding, Ellsberg’s psychiatrist. That ultimately would launch Ellsberg into mythological hero status—with some very material help from the CIA. But according to Caddy, we’re to believe that Hunt invited him to the luncheon so Caddy could sit and listen to Hunt and Barker drone on and on about the Bay of Pigs, never mentioning Ellsberg or the Pentagon Papers. Right-o.

Despite his self-contradictory stories, Caddy has the dubious distinction of being the only person in all the annals of Watergate ever to put Bernard Barker in Washington, D.C., around this crucial time. Neither Hunt nor Barker ever breathed a word of it.

Caddy had another meeting with Hunt in about mid-March of 1972—but this time along with the general counsel for the CIA, Lawrence R. Houston (whose name Caddy misstates, probably intentionally, as “Larry Huston”). This meeting was only about three months before the Watergate arrests, and it is illuminative to consider the CIA’s own biographical sketch of Houston:

The position of General Counsel was established within the CIA in 1947, the same year that President Truman signed into law the National Security Act that created the CIA. The first CIA General Counsel was Lawrence R. Houston, who had served as Assistant General Counsel of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS); General Counsel of its War Department successor organization, the Strategic Services Unit; and General Counsel of the Central Intelligence Group (CIG). Houston was a principal draftsman of the legislative proposal to abolish the CIG and establish the CIA, which was incorporated into the legislation that became the National Security Act.

When the CIG was abolished by the National Security Act of 1947, all CIG personnel were transferred by law to the newly established CIA, where Houston continued to serve as General Counsel. Within the next three years, two other attorneys, Walter Pforzheimer and John S. Warner, joined Houston as Assistant General Counsels. Together all three attorneys helped to draft the legislation that became the CIA Act of 1949, which gave CIA special statutory authorities unique within the federal government.[38]

This was no CIA file clerk meeting with Caddy and Hunt; this was the architect of the CIA. He, along with Hunt, had been there at its very inception. One former assistant general counsel of the CIA, A. John Radsan, has called Houston “the ultimate intelligence insider.”[39] That’s why it’s pointless to trot out here Caddy’s ridiculous “explanation” of what the meeting was about, just as in the case of his ridiculous “explanation” about the meeting with Hunt and Barker. The entire edifice of “Watergate” is built on the quicksand of just such wholly uncorroborated “explanations” of private meetings, all told by proven liars.

The relevant fact is that at the time of the meeting, Caddy was doing “volunteer” work for the Nixon campaign, part of which work just happened to involve reporting to G. Gordon Liddy to perform a number of “legal tasks.”[40] Yes: G. Gordon Liddy, Hunt’s co-mastermind of Watergate, the one with the CIA “special clearances.” And just a few weeks later, as of 25 April 1972, Caddy would be doing more “volunteer” work that he says was “under John Dean’s direction” right up until the Watergate arrests.[41] That’s the very John Dean who later will hide contents of E. Howard Hunt’s White House safe after the arrests, then give them to Acting Director of the FBI L. Patrick Gray, who will burn them.

“Ragtop” Caddy sure did get around, and the poor little man was just infested with CIA connections that he knew nothing about.

Caddy has said flat-out: “I have never been employed by the CIA or any other intelligence organization.” In the word-worminess of lawyers of Caddy’s ilk, that statement is almost certainly “true,” in one literal sense of not ever being on the payroll. In light of that, it’s worth considering testimony of the third Director of Central Intelligence, Roscoe H. Hillenkoetter, appearing before the Hoey Committee in the 1950s:

Hillenkoetter admitted that the CIA sometimes gave protection to homosexuals who came forward in exchange for their cooperation. “While this agency will never employ a homosexual on its rolls,” he insisted, “it might conceivably be necessary, and in the past has actually been valuable, to use known homosexuals as agents in the field.” The FBI had a similar policy of using and protecting homosexual informers. So while claiming homosexuals threatened national security, government officials also used them to protect it.[42]

At all times relevant to Watergate—and the parallel complex secret CIA plan to “appropriate” Scientology’s OT Levels—Douglas Caddy’s homosexuality was so under wraps that it led investigative author Jim Hougan to say in his landmark 1984 book, Secret Agenda, that “Caddy was about as conservative as they come, and there was no reason to suspect that he was anything but heterosexual.” Since then, Caddy has “come out,” and Hougan has publically corrected himself. But it also puts new light on something else Hougan said in that same book. General Paul Gaynor had been James McCord’s superior in the CIA as head of the Security Research Staff. According to Hougan:

A lifelong counterintelligence specialist, fascinated by the idea of a “Manchurian candidate,” General Gaynor was separately provided with this information [background checks] so that he might compare the names of new personnel and agents with dossiers in his legendary “fag file.” The file consisted of details concerning more than three hundred thousand Americans, mostly homosexuals, who had been arrested at one time or another for sexual offenses . . . Gaynor worked closely with the deputy chief of the Washington Police Department, Captain Roy E. Blick. According to every account, the late Captain Blick was sexually obsessed. A source for both J. Edgar Hoover’s FBI and the CIA under Allen Dulles and Richard Helms, Captain Blick maintained exhaustive files on the subject of sexual deviance, files that are said to have included the names of every prostitute, madam, pimp, homosexual, pederast, sado-masochist, and most points in between, of whatever nationality, who came to the attention of the police in the country’s capital.

When Douglas “Ragtop” Caddy came to Mullen in late 1969, was he listed in the Blick-Gaynor-McCord-Helms files? Had Caddy ever encountered New York’s “little CIA,” BOSSI, when he was in New York, but then had his record sheep-dipped by someone like John Caulfield or Tony Ulasewicz—the Tweedledee and Tweedledum who worked under the best friend the CIA and Hunt ever had, TweedleDean?

BOSSI alumnus John Caulfield became “a White House liaison with a variety of law enforcement agencies in the federal government” on Tuesday, 8 April 1969,43 mere months before Mr. Caddy came to Washington.

The very next day after Caulfield’s anointment, on Wednesday, 9 April 1969, an attorney in Miami, Florida, filed incorporation papers for a company called Ameritas, Inc., which would lie fallow for years, but would be revived by CIA stooge Bernard Barker in time to play a crucial role in Watergate during Memorial Day Weekend 1972.[44]

BOSSI alumnus Tony Ulasewicz got his invisible contract with Caulfield and the White House exactly one month after the creation of Ameritas, in the American Airlines VIP Lounge at LaGuardia Airport, on Friday, 9 May 1969.[45]

Within a few months, Douglas Caddy relocated from New York to D.C., arriving at the Mullen Company offices sometime late “in 1969.”

There was practically a blizzard of other invisible contracts in 1969. In March 1969, House Minority Leader Gerald Ford pulled strings for G. Gordon Liddy and got him appointed as Special Assistant to the Secretary of the Treasury for Enforcement. In that capacity, Liddy got a permit to carry a gun, and met John Dean. He also worked with Egil “Bud” Krogh during his Treasury stint, and, according to the FBI: “Liddy also worked directly with the CIA, had a secure telephone line directly to the CIA, and received CIA communications.”[46] Around the same time period as Caddy’s arrival at Mullen, G. Gordon Liddy was granted “special clearances” by the CIA, in December 1969.[47]

In March 1969 Lieutenant General Robert Cushman—who had roomed in 1950 with E. Howard Hunt—was nominated to be the Deputy Director of CIA. (He will be replaced in 1972, at a crucial time in Watergate, by Vernon Walters, who both Cushman and Hunt had long been connected with.)

Also in March 1969, the U.S. Navy dispatched two ships of the Sixth Fleet to Corfu, Greece, the Fremont and Grand County, where they set up sentry posts around the Scientology flagship Apollo, ultimately resulting in the ship being driven out of Greece and ending up in Morocco—where founder L. Ron Hubbard would later disappear, on or around Memorial Day Weekend 1972.

In June of 1969, Hubbard wrote: “Nelson Rockefeller finances and pushes forward the totalitarian idea of population control by psychiatry, and his foundations try to shove us around. In the news he and his family interests are under heavy attack in South America.”

On 19 June 1969, Carl M. Shoffler was officially released from over four years of military service, during which time he had served in Vietnam, and also had served in the Army Security Agency at Vint Hill Farm Station in Virginia, a top-secret installation of the NSA. Shoffler joined the Metropolitan Police Department in Washington, D.C., and later would be the lead arresting officer at the Watergate on 17 June 1972, having lurked around for more than two hours after his shift ended, waiting for the call.

In 1969, Hal Puthoff was still with the NSA, in Naval Intelligence—at least as far as anybody can tell, since Puthoff ain’t telling—and was already worming his way into Scientology toward the secret OT Levels.

In August 1969, a Navy Lieutenant with Top Secret clearances named Bob Woodward had voluntarily extended his service to take a position on the staff of the Chief of Naval Operations, Admiral Moorer. That’s the Woodward of “Woodstein” fame who later would feed the world the “Official Story” of Watergate, laying all the blame on “All the President’s Men”—except, of course, the CIA. In Woodward’s work with Moorer, he “reviewed the raw traffic that flowed into and out of the CNO’s office to and from the fleet, the CIA and the NSA, the State Department, and the NSC [National Security Council].”

On the NSC in 1969 was one David Young, serving as special administrative assistant to National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger. (Young would soon go on to work with Krogh, Hunt and Liddy in the “White House Plumbers” group, in 1971, after Daniel Ellsberg leaked the Pentagon Papers. Nobody in the White House Plumbers would ever plug a single leak.)

By 29 September 1969, Ingo Swann had become Scientology Clear #2231—and somehow had gotten clearance to register for and complete Scientology’s secret OT Level I.

On Wednesday, 1 October 1969—exactly three years to the day before the CIA would issue its secret contract to seize Hubbard’s OT Levels—Daniel Ellsberg went to the small advertising firm of a friend of his, Linda Sinay, and started the mammoth task of illegally copying the 7,000+ pages of the McNamara Report that had been entrusted to him, later known colloquially as the Pentagon Papers.

In 1969 Eugenio Martinez was put on a regular monthly retainer by the CIA.

Slowly, inexorably, the people who would become the cast of Watergate were being moved into position, almost like pieces on a giant living chessboard being moved by an unseen hand. (It probably would not be productive to carry the analogy far enough to speculate what piece Douglas Caddy might have been.)

Footnotes
25 FBI Report of 21 July 1972, from Acting Director, FBI, to The Attorney General.
26 Douglas Caddy post in the Education Forum, “Questions for Douglas Caddy,” retrieved 20 February 2014, http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=5892#entry52276
27 Ibid.
28 Douglas Caddy post in the Education Forum, “Introduction to St. John Hunt’s Book,” retrieved 20 February 2014, http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=19747#entry263645
29 Andrew III, John A. The Other Side of the Sixties. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press, 1997.
30 Douglas Caddy post in the Education Forum, “Introduction to St. John Hunt’s Book,” retrieved 20 February 2014, http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=19747#entry263645
31 Hunt, E. Howard. Undercover: Memoirs of an American Secret Agent. New York: Berkley Publishing Corporation, 1974.
32 The Special Subcommittee on Intelligence of The Committee on Armed Services, Inquiry Into the Alleged Involvement of The Central Intelligence Agency in the Watergate and Ellsberg Matters, House of Representatives, 94th Congress, H.A.S.C. No. 94-4 (1974)
33 FBI Report of interview conducted 21 June 1972 with Robert F Bennett by SAs Donald E. Stukey, II and John W. Minderman, Washington, D.C., File # WFO 139-166 [handwritten: -205]
34 Ibid.
35 Caddy, Douglas. “Introduction to St. John Hunt’s Book.” The Education Forum—Controversial Issues in History—JFK Assassination Debate. November 30, 2012. Accessed June 15, 2013. http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=19747.
36 Caddy, Douglas. “Questions for Douglas Caddy.” The Education Forum—Controversial Issues in History—JFK Assassination Debate. February 6, 2006. Accessed May 13, 2013. http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?s=4f987276525762e7e31a500f279940e4&showtopic=5892&page=3# entry53760.
37 Caddy, Douglas. “Douglas Caddy, Hunt, Liddy, Mullen, and the CIA.” The Education Forum— Controversial Issues in History—Watergate. June 15, 2006. Accessed May 13, 2013. http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=7079#entry65509.
38 “Offices of CIA—General Counsel—History of the Office.” Central Intelligence Agency. May 22, 2014. Accessed June 29, 2015. https://www.cia.gov/offices-of-cia/general-counsel/agencypage.2007-03- 26.1987163356.html.
39 Radsan, A. John. “Sed Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes: The CIA’s Office of General Counsel?” Journal of National Security Law & Policy 2, no. 201 (2008): 201-255. Accessed 2015. http://jnslp.com/wp- content/uploads/2010/08/01_Radsan-Master-09_11_08.pdf.
40 Caddy, Douglas. “Gay Bashing and Watergate.” Advocate.com, 1 August 2005
41 Caddy, Douglas. “Memoir on Being Original Attorney for the Watergate Seven.” The Education Forum. November 18, 2014. Accessed January 6, 2015.
42 Johnson, David K. The Lavender Scare: The Cold War Persecution of Gays and Lesbians in the Federal Government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.
43 Presidential Campaign Activities of 1972, Senate Resolution 60, Hearings Before the Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities of the United States Senate, Ninety-Third Congress, First Session, Watergate and Related Activities, Phase I: Watergate Investigation, Book 1, 93rd Cong. (1973) (Testimony of John Caulfield)
44 FBI Teletype of 23 June 1972.
45 Ulasewicz, Tony, and Stuart A. McKeever. The President’s Private Eye. Westport, Connecticut: MACSAM Publishing Company, 1990.
46 FBI Report of 17 July 1972 by SAs James W Hoffman and James R. Pledger, Washington, D.C., File # WFO 139-166
47 Testimony of witnesses: hearings before the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, Ninety-third congress, second session, pursuant to H. Res. 803, a resolution authorizing and directing the Committee on the Judiciary to investigate whether sufficient grounds exists for the House of Representatives to exercise its constitutional power to impeach Richard M. Nixon, President of the United States of America, Book III, 93rd Cong. (1974)

CIA Eagle Outline Art-4

Take action now!

Please CONTACT THE EDUCATION FORUM right now. Demand that they stop their unconscionable censorship, and that they restore the excerpt from Watergate: The Hoax that they stealthily hid from the public by deleting it. Meanwhile, find out the truth that the history departments and the Operation Mockingbird government-controlled press are still lying to you about. Get the book that destroys the lies—and that the Education Forum CENSORED!

UPDATE: Chalet Books has learned that Watergate: The Hoax has also been banned at Wikipedia. Details are now in a separate Chalet Reports article—CLICK HERE.

CIA Eagle Outline Art-4
Ashton Gray’s Watergate: The Hoax shreds the lies and myths about Watergate. It is finally rewriting the history books with the truth. Don’t be left out of this intellectual and historical revolution that rips the veil off of some of the dirtiest secrets in the history of the United States, and exposes the biggest crime against man’s storehouse of knowledge in the history of the world. Buy it, read it, give it to your friends and loved ones. “And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.”

 

 

Watergate: The Hoax is available now
at Amazon, iBooks and 
Barnes & Noble.
Order it today!

Rewrite history with the truth!

 

read more